Flesh-eating's forum posts

  • 36 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts
The "hate" it's receiving nowadays is nothing compared to the times around the H3 release--at that point, it was just as hated as CoD is now--astronomically. But now, Halo is not hated on. It's rather seen (generally) as a high-quality series.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts
1. Black Ops 2. MW2 3. Gears of War 4. CoD4 5. Halo 3 IMO.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts
You left out the most dominating force in entertainment (CoD) on purpose just to be cool.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts
Link: http://www.lensoftruth.com/infinity-ward-modern-warfare-3-puts-fun-over-cool-effects/ "There are games I play that are graphically beautiful and that's why I play them, but there are games like ours that are just fun," he said. "That's what we concentrate on. Everything is geared around making the game more fun." I think this would be the Call of Duty series in a nutshell. Fun, provided for the vast majority soughting after entertainment... Because in the end, we all know graphics is just... graphics, something you look at, and it doesn't make the game better. I also think this is one of the reasons MW3 will sell 30 million, and be much more popular than Crysis 2, or Rage or BF3, even though they look better. They are on the other hand not fun, simply put. What do you think? You still think they need to come up with a new engine, or is fun all that matters? :)
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="Chris_Williams"] i call B.S, honestly there shouldn't be a A or AA or AAA rating, grand theft auto 4 scored a 10 here and that game was boring and i and alot of my friends had to force our selves to play through it. where as infamous 2 and a dead island which i'm playing now i can't get enough of and i don't want it to end. I mean i know its all preference but some AAA games aren't worthy of that status and i think its silly that one guy on this site can decide which games are and aren't.

GTA4 wasn't even worth an AA IMO >_>. So yeah, GS can mess up a lot. CoDMW2 and Black Ops is another fantastic example.

Black Ops is the best Call of Duty. :o Come at me, bro. 8)

He doesn't have to come at you, I believe most would agree that BO is, along with CoD2, the best game in the series.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Flesh-eating"][QUOTE="xLittlekillx"]

Because it's better, and it renders modern warfare 3 moot in every way. I don't understand how anybody is even able to remember that modern warfare 3 exists after that delicious jet fighter gameplay footage.

xLittlekillx

No, it's not "better". While it looks better, that tells us... nothing about how it will fare against MW3. Just look at the gameplay videos on YouTube... All CoD videos, everyone looking forward to MW3. Not saying BF is bad, or no one going to play BF3, but MW3 is so much bigger, I don't even know why you made the comparison in the first hand... Because there is no comparison, and CoD is far above everything else, fighting against itself. BF3, along with KZ3, RE3, Crysis 2, Halo etc., are all fighting for second place. Capiche?

Wow, do you work for Activision or something? Sorry, but in every poll I've seen, even in Game Informer, bf3 is far ahead of mw3. Maybe people are just ready to step away from that rehashed casual shooter garbage and fly some jets? I don't know man, I'm not a wizard. Just a guy who likes good games.

"Wow, do you work for Activision?" Is that your best response to the facts I posted? Internet polls mean nothing... They are rather laughable at best.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Flesh-eating"][QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

judging by his thought process, which I believe I understand to an extent and can even agree with, these are sequels to games that were AAA.

Resistance 3 came off of the heels of Resistance 2 which was given a 9.0 and a contender for FPS GotY. Killzone 3 came off of the heels of Killzone 2 which earned a 9 and won FPS GotY in 2009. Crysis 2 came off the heels of Crysis which earned a 9.5 and won FPS GotY. It isn't just the difference in score, it's also the relevance in the games themselves to an extent.

That or maybe I'm just overthinking it. It's not like I care. Gimme Dark Souls and Skyward Sword already. :P

NeonNinja

Exactly... Potential AAA games turned into AA because they copied a highly successful series... The devs are hurting themselves, and I don't think they're noticing it.

What's really surprising is that we haven't had a AAA shooter yet this year. I'm wondering which will be the first. Could be Gears, Rage, BF3 or MW3. The thing is, the only one that actually looks cool is Rage. Than again, we could have a year where none of the games earn AAA. Now that would be something. But honestly, I'm really surprised that there hasn't been a single AAA shooter after 9 months of games. It's pretty ridiculous.

Yeah, if they (games mentioned) went their own way without looking too much at others, we would have a different year of shooters thus far, that's for sure.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="Flesh-eating"][QUOTE="xLittlekillx"]

I don't think it matters why people hate it, since the superior BF3 is coming out this year.

xLittlekillx

That's not going to change anything... It will be outsold, outplayed and possibly outscored like every other FPS, and forgotten by January 2012 while MW3 will be breaking all kind of records throughout 2011 and 2012... So I don't see how BF3 has anything to do with thus subject.

Because it's better, and it renders modern warfare 3 moot in every way. I don't understand how anybody is even able to remember that modern warfare 3 exists after that delicious jet fighter gameplay footage.

No, it's not "better". While it looks better, that tells us... nothing about how it will fare against MW3. Just look at the gameplay videos on YouTube... All CoD videos, everyone looking forward to MW3. Not saying BF is bad, or no one going to play BF3, but MW3 is so much bigger, I don't even know why you made the comparison in the first hand... Because there is no comparison, and CoD is far above everything else, fighting against itself. BF3, along with KZ3, RE3, Crysis 2, Halo etc., are all fighting for second place. Capiche?
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts

[QUOTE="el3m2tigre"]

[QUOTE="Flesh-eating"] Killzone 3, RE3, Crysis 2, Homefront etc... Soon to be UC3, too, I believe.NeonNinja

All of them, except for homefront, scored 8.5. Exactly how did they get punished?

judging by his thought process, which I believe I understand to an extent and can even agree with, these are sequels to games that were AAA.

Resistance 3 came off of the heels of Resistance 2 which was given a 9.0 and a contender for FPS GotY. Killzone 3 came off of the heels of Killzone 2 which earned a 9 and won FPS GotY in 2009. Crysis 2 came off the heels of Crysis which earned a 9.5 and won FPS GotY. It isn't just the difference in score, it's also the relevance in the games themselves to an extent.

That or maybe I'm just overthinking it. It's not like I care. Gimme Dark Souls and Skyward Sword already. :P

Exactly... Potential AAA games turned into AA because they copied a highly successful series... The devs are hurting themselves, and I don't think they're noticing it.
Avatar image for Flesh-eating
Flesh-eating

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Flesh-eating
Member since 2011 • 38 Posts

I don't think it matters why people hate it, since the superior BF3 is coming out this year.

xLittlekillx
That's not going to change anything... It will be outsold, outplayed and possibly outscored like every other FPS, and forgotten by January 2012 while MW3 will be breaking all kind of records throughout 2011 and 2012... So I don't see how BF3 has anything to do with thus subject.
  • 36 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4