[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="FreddyJeffery"][QUOTE="MrPraline"] rofl, FIRST DIBS ON THE WORD MARRIAGE, GUYS Hey that's how it works. Otherwise why would it be as such a big issue the last few centuries? Because religious people want to have a monopoly on the definition. To be able to decide how it's used. They do not. However it was not made for gays, it was made for male and female fromthe start, which is why Religion has a vast majority of control over it since they have the same views. Like i said, we need some kind of balancer.
[QUOTE="Nuck81"] You just got proved wrong by about six posts in a row junior. Game Over.Nuck81
Something tells me he'll ignore every single post.
You called it Lol cant even give me time to look and respond? Doesn't change the fact that there's obviously an issue or there wouldn't be so much push against gay unions now would there? it's an issue now, heck it may have been the only reason Romney was close to Obama in the popular vote despite being a complete failure imo.
[QUOTE="MrPraline"][QUOTE="FreddyJeffery"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Actually that's wrong. Same sex marriage existed in Rome, China and in some Native American tribes. The word was not meant for gays, it just became the only word and it's causing massive controversy. BTW rome happened religion already grabbed that word. So in both cases it's just there to make people yell at eachother. rofl, FIRST DIBS ON THE WORD MARRIAGE, GUYS Hey that's how it works. Otherwise why would it be as such a big issue the last few centuries?
[QUOTE="FreddyJeffery"]marriage never involved two of the same sexNuck81
Try Again. Same Sex Marriage was common enough in Western Culture until Christianity came rolling along. Again, the word was not meant for them and was consumed for the future of endless cycles of saying who is wrong and right. Judaism picked up the marriage afterward before gay marriage was "common" it's not supposed to happen period and you are all falling for it. Which is why religion bigots and others can't agree.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="FreddyJeffery"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] Jesus did quite a few things that directly violated Jewish views. Also taking things that Jesus didn't say as laws is pretty stupid. Doesn't matter, religion or not, marriage never involved two of the same sex, we had other things for that which the media shadowed so we can have fights like this so that people can stay in power. There is no actual meaning in people who are not wanted trying to break into something that does not allow them. if this was race as a person, yes, this would make more sense, but this is different. Actually that's wrong. Same sex marriage existed in Rome, China and in some Native American tribes. The word was not meant for gays, it just became the only word and it's causing massive controversy. BTW rome happened religion already grabbed that word. So in both cases it's just there to make people yell at eachother.
[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="FreddyJeffery"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] To be fair according to the Bible Christians shouldn't be wearing two types of fabric at the same time. Also Jesus didn't say a damn thing about gay marriage. So either you can accept all the crazy weird stuff the OT says along side the whole being anti-gay or you can add gay marriage to the list of things everyone ignores from the bible. Jesus however was a Jew, which means that the most likely had jewsih views, which means that no gay marriage. Gay marriage is not suppose to happen in churches, you can't be a christian and gay its disrespectful, but there is nothing that says that gas can't still believe in god, so why try so hard to go into something you are not welcome in? Also what does going shirtless accomplish? Jesus did quite a few things that directly violated Jewish views. Also taking things that Jesus didn't say as laws is pretty stupid. Doesn't matter, religion or not, marriage never involved two of the same sex, we had other things for that which the media shadowed so we can have fights like this so that people can stay in power. There is no actual meaning in people who are not wanted trying to break into something that does not allow them. if this was race as a person, yes, this would make more sense, but this is different.
Not sure if there are any politicians here, but I have to ask: The U.S. had 4 years of no progress at all except for a slight increase out the recession and osama bin laden. nothing was accomplished. Now we are even deeper in what President Son Bush had put us in, and the American Economy, no the world economy is in collapse. So what i want to know is why are we still exporting jobs and depending on foreign when that is what is constantly making the U.S. get worse like a charge off effects a credit score? Maybe the plan is to get the people paniced by pushing the dollar to be as low as possible, so the government can take over? or maybe congress is just stupid?
They are allowed. Just because something is written in the Bible doesn't mean somebody can't do it.
Ace6301
The question isn't whether they are capable of doing it. The question is if they should be doing it. Reading comprehension ftw. To be fair according to the Bible Christians shouldn't be wearing two types of fabric at the same time. Also Jesus didn't say a damn thing about gay marriage. So either you can accept all the crazy weird stuff the OT says along side the whole being anti-gay or you can add gay marriage to the list of things everyone ignores from the bible. Jesus however was a Jew, which means that the most likely had jewsih views, which means that no gay marriage. Gay marriage is not suppose to happen in churches, you can't be a christian and gay its disrespectful, but there is nothing that says that gas can't still believe in god, so why try so hard to go into something you are not welcome in? Also what does going shirtless accomplish?
Log in to comment