Everyone that voted no is either very poor, or doesn't have a job yet.

When you become an adult, you realize that $50 a year on an almost unlimited amount of entertainment is a pretty sweet deal.

I've spent $300 on dinner dates, and almost just as much to take my family to six flags for one day.

And for the people that say it's free elsewhere, it's not the same thing. I'd use the same arguement when comparing PS3 price to 360. The more you pay, the more features you get. If you PS3 fanboys are so against paying more to get more, then why would you buy a PS3?

Northernboxer

The thing is, there are not more features you get on XBL, you can play online (mostly peer to peer gaming) and download demos earlier with XBL gold (You can do this without paying on PSN)

I am an adult and i've made enough money in a year to buy lots of years of XBL gold but i see no reason to throw my money out of the window into Microsofts pocket for something i get on my PS3 & PC for free.

MS fanboys seem to think that XBL is something special, its not. You get the same on other platforms and i've even experienced less lag on PSN thus far.

Absolutely not. Windows live is free, PSN is free, and whatever Wiis service is called is also free and i have experienced less lag on PSN than XBL. Thats why i'm silver at the moment i don't see a reason to get gold again. (Maybe if one of my friends finally decides to get a 360..)

My guess is that XBL will be free in the next generation, there is just no reason we have to pay for peer to peer gaming especially when the rivals are offering free service.

I would understand that we have to pay for it if they had dedicated servers in all games.

I don't think it will happen, 360 is just cheap and has a huge library of good games, the gap will become bigger i think.

Geeze, that game gets worse the more I see it. So much for Forza having the best environments.aaronmullan

You realize that they just release screens of less interesting looking tracks recently? That has nothing to do with environment graphics getting worse, these tracks look unspectacular in reality.

[QUOTE="mythrol"]half the people are saying "photoshop mode, no way the graphics look this good." and the other half are saying "whoa, super downgrade!" Cows. You should really work on your damage control. This split tactic your using just isn't effective.aaronmullan

They are out of focus -.- Man some of you are unbelievable...

people are ignorant...first of all these are close up shots, secondly its evident these are captured in motion hence the motion blur which is why in the two action shots the enviornments are blurred as well.

stop trying to downgrade the game.

Innovazero2000

Its a common photomode technique in racing games, adding blur to add a sense of speed, only a fool would think that the game actually looks like that all the time.

Wow what an improvement over Forza 2, Turn 10 outdid themselves. Graphics were the only thing F2 was lacking imo and i oved it nevertheless, this one is gonna be amazing.

Forza looks good but I really have to give the edge to GT for having twice as many cars on track. I'm going with GT.

MegajerkNYC

The only times i noticed the more cars in GT5P was when there were so many on screen that the game had framerate drops. Quality (Smarter AI) over quantity imo

Both, they are not too similar and each have their appeal to me.

It would probably run on the current average PC "gamer" specs. But it would at least have a FOV over 45 degrees.Killzone 2 has one of the smallest FOVs I've ever seen in a FPS. It was like playing the game while wearing a helmet with the visor down, which was really annoying since the lead character didn't wear a helmet. It was really distracting to me.

heretrix

Is this true? Because i felt that something wasn't right while playing it, i even got motion sickness and never got that with any other game.