@Saspisa I continue to tell you people. Square Enix is pure shit. No one listens. Square Enix has fucked up everything they've ever touched, including Eidos, especially Eidos's franchises - Deus Ex and Tomb Raider. It is absolutely no surprise people are going to bitch and cry about this game whether it was made by Eidos or CD. The gaming of the past is gone and I hate to tell you, it's never coming back.
How did this game get an 8.5 if Rising Revengeance got an 8.5? I haven't played TR but I highly doubt that makes any sense. While Revengeance was playable, TR undoubtedly has a better story, is longer, has better cohesion, less absurd over-the-top action and more gameplay. I fail to see how your rating system is consistent.
@downloadthefile There is a third party, the constitution party, i.e libertarians, but all you fake Americans are too busy wrapped up in the two-party system facade sold to you by your owners that you don't realize there is a party which stands for the constitution, and it's the only party you should be supporting.
E.G 58% of US adults are mentally retarded immature assholes, because no adult blames an inanimate piece of plastic for their failure or societies failure to raise mentally healthy future generations.
BTW the features you mentioned are by no means innovative and have been in games for quite a while. Other games had contextual melee. HL2 introduced location-specific hit-points to replace hit-boxes, a decade ago. Every 3ps since 3ps became popular has had a good cover system. The only thing RE6 introduced that was actually good was the counter system, shooting while down (something that was in L4D but you are immobile in L4D), sliding, and healing your partner while reviving them. Those are good features but they don't excuse the fact that the game itself is boring and doesn't merit good features. The ONLY good thing about RE6 is the multiplayer and the single player mercs. Ada used to be the best campaign, the only good campaign, but they ruined that too by making it co-op which defeated the entire reason it was good in the first place.
None of that excuses the non-existent story, gigantic plot holes, loose ends, boring gameplay, boring and unintimidating enemies, almost pointless dialogue and cut-scenes, the hyperbolic silliness, the steps backward in gun upgrading, the terribly derivative enemy design, the CoD sequences, the forced and contrite annoying attempts to reference the old games, or the simply broken parts.
@TheIfym20 The controls are still tank controls, in any game where you control something in 3D. What you mean to say is that the old games made it difficult to move because the axes of movement were not based on a consistent geometric plane, they changed based on camera angle, usually. The controls are hardly different, if not as bad, in RE4, 5, or 6, or ORC, or Revelations.
@Strider8009 @resident_jisen @Chaos_Dante_456 The sheer amount of OMG A TRUCK WATCH OUT/OMG a [insert exploding out of control vehicle]! in Leon's campaign alone is absofuckinglutely ridiculous.
@resident_jisen @Chaos_Dante_456 Then you don't know what the word story means nor did you play the game because there was no story. The plot was not explained until the last chapter of every campaign. Until that there was absolutely no story whatsoever that actually mattered. It was literally never explained why or how Tall Oaks got infected. They just showed a lepricosa and assumed that we're all fucking 3 year olds and that simply showing a BOW that could infect people in a VERY small radius, explained how an ENTIRE town got infected. They also expected us to believe that, somewhere in America, there would be a secret (and really shitty and inadequate) lab underground, that leads into an ancient, but not older than the length of time cavern that literally descends beyond the crust of the Earth and yet, somehow, descending further down, will spit you out the side of the coastline into a lake or ocean. That was just part of how ridiculous it was.
Grenadeh's comments