GreyFoXX4's forum posts

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="campzor"]can crysis 2 have good A.I?xhawk27

And you think KZ3 does? :?

In a whole different ball park as far as AI goes, crysis has some of the worse ai I've ever seen in a game. And to the tc, its funny that some of the bodies are glitching and just hovering over the steps. Seems as though, it can't really handle itself or its awe inspiring physics engine lol.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
Killzone 3's water is all pre rendered anyways.lucfonzy
Not the water that you can actually run through, and that is the water that they should have showed. Theres water in canals, and water in the streets that you run through and is very impressive.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

Whats going to eat ppl up is when they compare this to KZ3 lol. KZ3 is going to smack it all over the place.

But good to see its good for what ever console you want to buy it own. Okay job Crytek.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Call it like it is, no actual 720p, screen tearing, pop-in, jaggie's, animation glitches, inconsistant graphics, dumb AI, story drags its feet, and so on. But the first mentioned is really mentioned everywhere, and those say its not taking the crown.

Snugenz

So what you're saying is, they're correct about one thing and wrong about the other yeah?

Well one they stated facts that can be backed up and the other they stated their oppinion which can be influenced.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Yes it has issues, but dont act like they make the game unplayable or that no game on the PS3 thats considered one of the top graphical games dont have issues.

Snugenz

But show me a game that gets hit by most if not all sites for its issues, but goes on and take the crown or even better yet even gets mentioned for it. Well Geow did, but once again there was no competition out at the time.

As i said in my edit, some of the sites that mentioned the issues that you like bringing up are sites that claimed it to be the best looking console game. Maybe you should ask them why as i havnt played the game and have no personal opinion on C2 yet.

Think we all know what happens with review sites and publishers, so maybe you should think why a reviewer lists issues on top of issues, but then gives a good score or what have you.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Just to clarify, i'm talking about the two Ironsight shots, Greyfoxx posted.

Snugenz

Exactly every game has its ugly parts, but review after review talks about the issues of Crysis 2 on consoles but yet people are over looking those issues and still saying its the graphics king. Sorry, but high amount of pop-in, frame rate dips, animation glitches, and so on then that game doesn't deserve the crown. And these issues are reported for the 360 aswell, so just don't say its the ps3 version. Heck most sites haven't even reviewed the ps3 version yet.

Yes it has issues, but dont act like they make the game unplayable or that no game on the PS3 thats considered one of the top graphical games dont have issues.

And what i find funny is, people love mentioning how the loads of reviews state the game has some performance issues, but call foul when some of these sites claim its the best looking game on consoles etc. ?

Call it like it is, no actual 720p, screen tearing, pop-in, jaggie's, animation glitches, inconsistant graphics, dumb AI, story drags its feet, and so on. But the first mentioned is really mentioned everywhere, and those say its not taking the crown.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

Just to clarify, i'm talking about the two Ironsight shots, Greyfoxx posted.

Snugenz

Exactly every game has its ugly parts, but review after review talks about the issues of Crysis 2 on consoles but yet people are over looking those issues and still saying its the graphics king. Sorry, but high amount of pop-in, frame rate dips, animation glitches, and so on then that game doesn't deserve the crown. And these issues are reported for the 360 aswell, so just don't say its the ps3 version. Heck most sites haven't even reviewed the ps3 version yet.

Yes it has issues, but dont act like they make the game unplayable or that no game on the PS3 thats considered one of the top graphical games dont have issues.

But show me a game that gets hit by most if not all sites for its issues, but goes on and take the crown or even better yet even gets mentioned for it. Well Geow did, but once again there was no competition out at the time.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="-Tretiak"]

DreamCryotank

Awesome blur, and once again oooooh SHINEY!! Now actually show me some actual combat scenes with good enemy character models and the amount of stuff going on in KZ3. Crysis 2 is a sterile enviorment, sorta reminds of Rb6V2. And reviews after reviews talk about its issues. If we are now over looking issues with games, then maybe Killzone on the ps2 shouldn't have been knocked so hard huh.

P.S. Amazing how you can actually see cracks in the ground in KZ3 further ahead than 5 feet in front of you huh lol.

Lolwut?

Killzone 3

Call Of Duty: Black Ops

Killzone 3 is a COD clone, simple fact. Because a game chucks loads of low res particles and explosions =/= good graphics.

Crysis 2

Sorry, there's no contest.

That is the cleanest action sequence I've ever seen. Man all of that stuff, and the air seems as clear as it was before it happened lol. Sorry but that just screams cheap and sterile.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

But those horrible KZ3 pics posted in the previous page are jaw dropping?

I really dont see what people on both sides have to downplay either game?, they're both amazing looking games for the tech they're running on and every game has ugly parts, its nothing new. Is there really any need to go into further than that and start knitpicking the tiniest details?

Snugenz

No, those KZ3 pics weren't jaw dropping. They were compressed YouTube shots. Even if they weren't, no console game will ever make my jaw drop.

Just to clarify, i'm talking about the two Ironsight shots, Greyfoxx posted.

Exactly every game has its ugly parts, but review after review talks about the issues of Crysis 2 on consoles but yet people are over looking those issues and still saying its the graphics king. Sorry, but high amount of pop-in, frame rate dips, animation glitches, and so on then that game doesn't deserve the crown. And these issues are reported for the 360 aswell, so just don't say its the ps3 version. Heck most sites haven't even reviewed the ps3 version yet.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss154"]

The only thing impressive about those shots is the rather overdone depth of field.

BigBoss154

But those horrible KZ3 pics posted in the previous page are jaw dropping?

I really dont see what people on both sides have to downplay either game?, they're both amazing looking games for the tech they're running on and every game has ugly parts, its nothing new. Is there really any need to go into further than that and start knitpicking the tiniest details?

No, those KZ3 pics weren't jaw dropping. They were compressed YouTube shots. Even if they weren't, no console game will ever make my jaw drop.

Also pics never make my mouth drop, now a game in motion can. Only wallpaper makers love screens, such as Crysis players :)