I'm quite sure that everything I say will be ignored/has already been said. However, I think some people should note a few things. 1) Microsoft aren't doing this as a favour to the fans, Microsoft are doing this because they realised that their previous money grabbing policies were going to fail them, therefore they decided to change their stance because that would make them more money. 2) Sony's console is technically more powerful than the XboxOne (fact). 3) Sony has not tried to screw you over. 4) I know the subject of games is subjective, but Sony is way ahead of Sony in terms of the diversity of their games catalogue. Especially considering the support they give to their first party developers and indie studios. 5) If you buy an XboxOne, the only reason you should do so is if you want to play Halo DESPERATELY. 6) DON'T BE A FOOL WHEN YOU BUY ONE OF THESE CONSOLES. 7) XboxOne will be a good machine, no doubt. However, think about the company you're supporting, and the priorities that they have. Unfortunately, Microsoft have shown themselves to think about themselves first, and consumers second. Sony has put the consumer first. 8) PS4 IS MUCH CHEAPER!
I won't even be buying any of these consoles as I play on the PC, but all the information I've obtained seems to point the way of Sony being the best company to support. You would be fools if you didn't do so.
I think everyone is too hung up on specific words. In support of the developer, it is meant to be an entertainment product and it is just a video game. I'm quite sure they never set out originally to seriously convey the awful things that come from war. It's a capitalist driven industry, it's about selling products for them that the customer can enjoy.
I think the journalist is going a bit harsh on the whole picking out certain words he's used, and taken them really to heart.
War is terrible, we can all agree about that. But despite the combat mechanics used in this MoH game, I do think the developers have respect for the troops, and you can't fault them just for doing their jobs, enjoying their jobs and producing a good game.
I think to be honest, that despite everyone said that Gears 1 had hardly any colour, I think that Gears 2 has less... Everything seems to have a strange tiny of yellow going on, and that's about it :L... (Well in some of the environments :L.
When I got this. I just couldn't get into it. I got to level 15 I think, then had to stop from the boredom. I I have played other MMO's and enjoyed them much more thoroughly than WoW... However, I understand and respect how people like this game, given its scale and depth.
Yer but some people got the pc's to run it, so buy the game for the pc if you have a good enough rack. So 360 would not look as good as a pc that could run it a nearly/all of its potential
Well XP high quality still looks pretty nice, small difference to very high quality XP, maybe more of a difference to Vista Very High Quality, but when it comes to XP very high quality and Vista, I dont think the difference is that massive, that if any people are changing their windows to play this game, they neednt do it.
well ive got a radeon 1950x, and believe it or not, i play it on all highsettings... and no lag or anything in fact ive been playing bioshock and enemy territory: quake wars on high settings to without any continuous lag.
Well i aint bought it yet...but if the demo all runs high on default settings...and doesnt feature much lag or anything, then i suppose mine is fine lol... im one of those people who dont understand this... i just go on if the card has good reviews and has good price to say its a good card...but one day il learn how good they are just by looking at the name lol
GriffinLord602's comments