Who would you nominate to receive an award? Because now it's possible to reward those that the average user think are the most ethical and helpful: http://www.spj.org/kunkel-nominate.asp
And this is good for system wars too because since our bias always gets the best of us we tend to use outside sources to justify our opinions but who exactly should we trust? What if the source is even more biased than we are? XD
SPJ’s inaugural Kunkel Awards recognizes excellence in video game journalism.
Nominate an entry
Follow this link to submit a nomination. Anyone can nominate an entry at no cost. Nominations are due February 14, 2016 at 11:59:59 p.m. ET.
Anyone can nominate an entry at no cost, and all entries will be judged by professional journalists. Review our categories and submit an entry at the bottom of our nominations section.
The deadline for nominating an entry is 11:59:59 p.m. ET Sunday, February 14.
To learn how winners will be chosen, see our judging section, andcheck updates on our blog.
Since this is the first-ever Kunkel Awards, there are sure to be questions. If you have one or five, contact us. We’ll do our best to clarify and accommodate.
Who is Bill Kunkel?
Bill Kunkel “helped invent video game journalism,” The New York Times declared in Kunkel’s 2011 obituary. He co-published the first gaming column in 1978 and co-founded the first gaming magazine, Electronic Games, in 1981. His family has gratefully lent his name to these awards.
Jump to: Top | Nominate an Entry | Categories | Nominations | Judging | Contact | Blog
Categories
SPJ intentionally limited the number and scope of the categories. The goal: Encourage ethical and balanced news reporting of a fast-growing industry with millions of customers.
Excellence in News Reporting
One story, or up to three stories on a single topic. News can be breaking (reporting on something that just happened), in-depth (studying a topic by surveying all sides), or investigative (digging into a topic by uncovering previously unknown facts). No one kind is considered superior by the judges.
Excellence in Feature Writing
One story, or up to three stories on a single topic. A feature can be a profile (an in-depth look at one person), a Q&A (a verbatim interview with one person), or a color piece (a descriptive put-you-there story).
Excellence in News Video/Streaming
One recording of no more than one hour. See description above. Can be edited down from a longer stream. As with written submissions, judges expect multi-sourcing (see judging criteria).
Excellence in Feature Video/Streaming
One recording of no more than one hour. See description above. Can be edited down from a longer stream. As with written submissions, judges expect multi-sourcing (see judging criteria).
Excellence in Photography/ Illustration/ Infographic
One photo, original illustration, or infographic. Visuals are a crucial part of journalism. Submissions should stand alone as visual elements but also complement any text surrounding them. Submit with any supporting text and as a separate file, so judges can focus on both elements.
Jump to: Top | Nominate an Entry | Categories | Nominations | Judging | Contact | Blog
Nominations
Nominate an entry
Follow this link to submit a nomination. Anyone can nominate an entry at no cost. Nominations are due February 14, 2016 at 11:59:59 p.m. ET.
The Kunkel Awards are a People’s Choice hybrid: The public nominates the entries, but SPJ’s judges choose the winners.
Anyone can nominate an entry — the author, an impressed reader, even the author’s mom. It costs nothing to submit a nomination, and you can do so anonymously if you’re paranoid or wanted by the law.
The number of times an entry is nominated means nothing. In fact, we won’t tell the judges how often an entry was nominated. So no need to stuff the ballot box.
Nomination rules
— Entries must have been published or posted in the 2015 calendar year.
— Entries can be from anywhere. We don’t care if they’re from a national website or a personal blog. They just have to be ethical and excellent.
— You don’t need permission from the author or the media outlet. If they win and get mad about it, we’ll deal with them.
— All entries must be in English or have translation available. Sorry for being ethnocentric.
Jump to: Top | Nominate an Entry | Categories | Nominations | Judging | Contact | Blog
Judging
All judges are professional journalists working outside the gaming press, but with varying degrees of knowledge about it. Judges will write comments about the winners, which will be posted when the winners are announced.
The judging criteria:
Accuracy
Don’t trust, verify. This covers everything from spelling names correctly to ensuring all claims are indeed facts — and if you can’t verify those facts, admitting as much to your readers, so they can draw their own conclusions.
Balance
Give all sides their say. It’s called multi-sourcing. No award-winning report has just one source. Talking to all sides doesn’t mean giving them all equal space. It simply means giving them all a fair chance to explain their positions.
Clarity
Explaining isn’t easy. The hardest part of journalism (or anything) is describing complex or technical concepts in plain English. That means no jargon readers won’t grasp. It also means weaving background into the story without bogging it down.
Verve
Journalism isn’t supposed to be boring. You can be accurate, balanced, and clear — and no one will read or listen if you’re dull and stuffy. You need a conversational or even witty writing/speaking style to hold your audience’s attention.
SPJ Code of Ethics
Last on the list is first for the judges. If you can’t apply the principles of the SPJ Code of Ethics that all good journalists do — hell, even the slimeballs who ignore it know about it — then nothing else above matters.
Jump to: Top | Nominate an Entry | Categories | Nominations | Judging | Contact | Blog
Contact us
SPJ national board member Michael Koretzky is director of the Kunkel Awards (but not a judge). If you have questions or comments, reach him here.
Log in to comment