I'm disappointed with the PS3's lack of games, long development cycles, constant delays, and Sony's out-of-touch with TRUE gamers. Sony should've had the price point more customer friendly from the get go. Sony should've created a more developer friendly console or much more better dev-kits that were actually more manageable for the devs. Now we have some developers who just refuse to work with the PS3 just because of it's architect, in particular the Cell CPU. The GPU in the PS3 should've been more thought out, then it wouldn't be causing a bottleneck in the system.[QUOTE="UnrealSin_X"]And why?gamer082009
Sony needs to get in touch with us TRUE gamers again, especially the original PlayStation fans who feel left out and betrayed by Sony. Sony shouldn't have tried to sell the PS3 as a multimedia center first but instead as a gaming machine first and then a multimedia machine last. Lastly, Sony needs to reconnect with it's core audience and realize that the PlayStation name won't stay alive unless Sony has something to back it up with,,, and that's games. So that's why I'm disappointed with the PS3 and Sony.
While this statement is some what correct the only problems problems seem to be with the Lazy developers Like EA and valvle (at least right now) and the studios that actually put effort in trying to draw out the system's potentialare seeing really good results such as, Konami, Insomniac, naughty dog, Take Two, Activision, and eventually Square-Enix and Level 5
Log in to comment