[QUOTE="Hahadouken"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"] Nope. Its called being used to PC games. Blurry, muddy, low res, pixelated, fuzzy and jaggy washed out mess is what the game is.RDR in 1920x1080p with 8 X AA and 16 X AF on PC however... Would blow my mind ;)
Mozelleple112
It's called relativity. Ferrarri's are faster than GTR's. Does this make GTR's "slow"? It does not. I love this elitist snobbery about PC games. I PC game as well, it's not like you're part of some super secret covenant. Simply put, RDR doesn't have "terrible" graphics in any way shape or form. a GTR will out peformn ANY Ferrarri on ANY race track that does not consist solely of straight lines.... Terrible comparison. And RDR looks damn well UGLY to me. If it looks UGLY to you, what does say, Arkania, look like? Alpha Protocol?
You need to get familiar with the concept of HYPERBOLE. I'm stealing this from Louis CK, but if you start off at "AMAZING", where do you go from there? If your Starbucks latte is "amazing", what is the birth of your child? Super-hyper-amazing?
No matter how you slice it, RDR is not "ugly", unless you have a completely distorted sense of scale.
On the topic of cars, who gives a ****? The comparison I was making was pretty clear.
Log in to comment