HardQuor's forum posts

Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF JOE REPUBLICANPanzer-schreck

Nice. I hope you're rockin' that awesome flame shield stile though.

In other news, I like this color thing people are doing with their text. I love fads i don't have to pay for.

Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
Wow. I voted Yes, but i wasn't thinking about sex. I was thinking about a forum where "bad" words wouldn't be censored. And for those of you who think that being mature somehow means never uttering such profanities, need to grow up. I agree that spouting them at the slightest provocation is unneccessary, but the words carry a purpose, even to the mature.
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
I used to drink NOS to keep awake during my security graveyard shift. I fell asleep just about 1/4th of the time. No matter how much sleep i had, NOS was the only thing that could keep me up. Forget about Red Bull and Rockstar and all that other BS.
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
Aww, you give us too much credit. Really, most of the work was done by the Republican party :)
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts

Mariachi music. I'm Mexican and can not understand for the life of me what the hell the appeal is. every song sounds like the last: Mexican Polka. And I LIKE Wierd Al.

Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
in the MMOs that i've played, you dont lose anything, except experience or equipment durability.
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
Oh, i got a good one. A god damned sense of empathy. Then maybe we wouldn't have all these groups of people stepping on each other's toes.
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts

[QUOTE="HardQuor"]Marriage has existed long before Christianity (or any religious institution) had ever been found. As far back as 3000 BC (and most likely before then), the ancient Egyptians were practicing marriages. And they had the sense to acknowledge them as non-religious, civil unions. (source)

Now while you may argue that there's no evidence that the ancient Egyptians allowed for homosexual marriages, we do know that their marriages were not religious matters. If marriages are wholly civil matters, left in the hands of the government, then that government is the only authority that can say whether or not homosexuals can marry. Not any religion, no matter how deluded they are in thinking they are under attack.

Our government is run by it's citizens, it's public. Therefore, we - the people - are the only ones that should be defining who can and can not marry. Why we've allowed this religious farce to keep a stranglehold on what is purely a non-religious matter is beyond me. Especially when considering the fact that, as a nation, we've been fighting for human rights, equality, and freedom for over a century.Super_Socialist

the public has no valid say in what two people should be able to do, including marriage. get the gov out of this because it has no purpose.

Government oppression is oppression.

I find it hilarious that people talk like the government shouldn't control people but they have a right to rob people of a marriage because of their sexual preference.

I can't stand socialism and I can't stand governments and politicians acting like they have a right to take rights or privacy from people.

If there was actually a politician with a chance that supported all this, I'd vote for him in a heartbeat.

-TheSecondSign-
I think some of you are a little confused about the government's role in all of this. I would normally agree that the government should take a backseat when it comes to our personal freedoms, but in this instance, it's the government that is PROVIDING the benefits for marriage. The government taxes us, married couples get tax cuts. The insurance companies regard government-recognized married couples in a much better light than singles. The banks regard them in much the same way when considering loans. The same goes for credit bureaus. So it's not so much that the government is telling us what to do, it's the government providing benefits for a select group, then telling us that only certain people can be a part of that group.
Avatar image for HardQuor
HardQuor

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

23

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 HardQuor
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts

[QUOTE="DrSponge"]Marriage is a religious thing isn't it?mrbojangles25

technically, yes

no, it isn't, not even technically. Please refer to my post and it's source. Here, i'll even quote it so you don't have to go back a page.
Marriage has existed long before Christianity (or any religious institution) had ever been found. As far back as 3000 BC (and most likely before then), the ancient Egyptians were practicing marriages. And they had the sense to acknowledge them as non-religious, civil unions. (source)

Now while you may argue that there's no evidence that the ancient Egyptians allowed for homosexual marriages, we do know that their marriages were not religious matters. If marriages are wholly civil matters, left in the hands of the government, then that government is the only authority that can say whether or not homosexuals can marry. Not any religion, no matter how deluded they are in thinking they are under attack.

Our government is run by it's citizens, it's public. Therefore, we - the people - are the only ones that should be defining who can and can not marry. Why we've allowed this religious farce to keep a stranglehold on what is purely a non-religious matter is beyond me. Especially when considering the fact that, as a nation, we've been fighting for human rights, equality, and freedom for over a century.HardQuor