Works his way through law school yet disregards the law? Sounds like a beauty! Solaryellow

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Please, do explain. I find that people who choose to insult rather than discuss a topic are the ones usually lacking in the IQ department.

1) This one is not usual.

So please, explain why my post is dumb. Was anything I said incorrect?

2) Well you can't say it's incorrect when it's speculations. But it's certainly some very dumb speculations.

Are there or are there not illegal Israeli settlements in Palestinian land?

3) It's not a yes or no question.

Does the US not block any resolution that would negatively affect Israel?

4) They do not.

Is Israel not a major divisive point between the US and a lot of Arab nations?

5) True. But what's the point? Not supporting Israel because it would upset some corrupt dictators is a horrible argument.

I would much rather have a civil discussion with you on the matter, but if you'd rather just throw out insults without explaining thats cool too....

6) I know it's cool, that's why I did it.

themajormayor

1) I dont really know what you meant by this comment, so I'm just gonna move on to the next one....

2) Speculations? Ok I will prove that they are in fact no speculations are facts.

3) What do you mean its not a yes or no question? I asked you a question that can be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no'...the definition of a "yes/no" question. But since you seem incapable or unwilling to answer the question (because the answer isnt favorable for you), I will help you out:

Aljazeera link

knowing full well you will discredit Aljazeera because of its Arab sounding name, I will provide more links:

Wikipedia

CNN

CNN (2)

BBC

I have given you 4 different sources all showing that Israeli settlements are in fact illegal under international law...so in conclusion, the answer to my question is "Yes, Israel does have illegal settlements within Palestinian land"

It's not a yes or no question cause there are things that need to be established before it can be answered. Such as what "illegal" means and what "Palestinian land" means. Ok so it's now as of your latest post established that you were talking about international law. I looked at your first link and while it says that they are illegal doesn't make it so. A newspaper stating that it does doesn't mean anything. What does the actual law say? I know very well what will be presented. And tbh it's open to debate if they really are breaking international law or not based on what you will present if you look around a bit. Most importantly how is international law actually relevant in a discussion between you and me? I definitely think it's important that they exist just as I think it's important that a country has domestic laws. But it's not a holy text and they are relevant to a courtroom and not here IMO. 

I studied alot of arabic. I would not discredit anything because it sounds arabic. Anyone with that mindset would have a hard time in Israel where pretty much everything is written in Arabic. 

4) You claim the US does not block UN resolutions that would be deletirious to Israel? Well, let me give you some links supporting my claims that the US does in fact do so:

CNN

LA Times

List of All US Israel related Vetoes

I claim that they do not block ANY UN resolution that would be deletirious to Israel. I know they block some. But why would they not if they disagree with them?

Here's a list of UN SC resolutions regarding Israel that were not vetoed. Not all of them are neccesarily against Israel but some of them are which you can find if you quickly glance through them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_UN_resolutions_concerning_Israel_and_Palestine#United_Nations_Security_Council_resolutions

5) Im not saying the US should just ignore Israel and help Palestinian unilaterally as they do Israel, I'm saying that the US should treat both sides equally and that will improve their perception amongst Arab nations, not just leaders, but also the people on the ground. Last I remember, it wasnt a nation that did the 9/11 attacks, it was a group of individuals. You can try to kill all your enemies, but you'll just end up making more. The best way to defeat an enemy is to make him your ally.

It's not unilateral.

Regardless. I think they should act as they see just and moral. Not to win a popularity contest.

6) Once again, an immature comment. I would love to have a civil discussion with you on the matter at hand based on facts, as I have presented in this post. I look forward to a mature and fact filled response.

What? well what other law would we be discussing? This is a international conflict so I would assume that international law is the only relevant law. We certainly wouldnt use US law to resolve an international dispute. Ok, so please tell me, what are we supposed to have a discussion based on if we cant use facts? Just make up stuff? If i can't use international law in a discussion regarding an international conflict just because it is "you and i" speaking..whats the relevant law to use? Im really curious, cause it seems like this discussion is making less and less sense the more it progresses.

If you are an illegal immigrant, you shouldnt be allowed to get a job. No exceptions should be made. I understand the plight of some of these people but if you keep making exceptions to the law, you have no law at all. He is considered an ILLEGAL immigrant for a reason, he is in the country illegally, hence, outside of the law.

PS: I have nothing against illegal immigrants, and I empathize and understand why many move to the states illegally, but they should never forget they are disobeying the laws and cant expect to get special treatment.

Please, do explain. I find that people who choose to insult rather than discuss a topic are the ones usually lacking in the IQ department.

1) This one is not usual.

So please, explain why my post is dumb. Was anything I said incorrect?

2) Well you can't say it's incorrect when it's speculations. But it's certainly some very dumb speculations.

Are there or are there not illegal Israeli settlements in Palestinian land?

3) It's not a yes or no question.

Does the US not block any resolution that would negatively affect Israel?

4) They do not.

Is Israel not a major divisive point between the US and a lot of Arab nations?

5) True. But what's the point? Not supporting Israel because it would upset some corrupt dictators is a horrible argument.

I would much rather have a civil discussion with you on the matter, but if you'd rather just throw out insults without explaining thats cool too....

6) I know it's cool, that's why I did it.

themajormayor

1) I dont really know what you meant by this comment, so I'm just gonna move on to the next one....

2) Speculations? Ok I will prove that they are in fact no speculations are facts.

3) What do you mean its not a yes or no question? I asked you a question that can be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no'...the definition of a "yes/no" question. But since you seem incapable or unwilling to answer the question (because the answer isnt favorable for you), I will help you out:

Aljazeera link

knowing full well you will discredit Aljazeera because of its Arab sounding name, I will provide more links:

Wikipedia

CNN

CNN (2)

BBC

I have given you 4 different sources all showing that Israeli settlements are in fact illegal under international law...so in conclusion, the answer to my question is "Yes, Israel does have illegal settlements within Palestinian land"

4) You claim the US does not block UN resolutions that would be deletirious to Israel? Well, let me give you some links supporting my claims that the US does in fact do so:

CNN

LA Times

List of All US Israel related Vetoes

5) Im not saying the US should just ignore Israel and help Palestinian unilaterally as they do Israel, I'm saying that the US should treat both sides equally and that will improve their perception amongst Arab nations, not just leaders, but also the people on the ground. Last I remember, it wasnt a nation that did the 9/11 attacks, it was a group of individuals. You can try to kill all your enemies, but you'll just end up making more. The best way to defeat an enemy is to make him your ally.

6) Once again, an immature comment. I would love to have a civil discussion with you on the matter at hand based on facts, as I have presented in this post. I look forward to a mature and fact filled response.

I dont understand why they even careCapitan_Kid