[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]

Replayablity? :lol:

Look I really like Halo but its replayability is NOTHING compared to UT3, Crysis and HL2 ep2.

skrat_01

As I said its online isnt much to parade (sure if your a console only gamer it was the best for a while), and its replayability has nothing on Crysis's dynamic mission structure, power struggle mp, sanbox editor, UT3's massive amount of gameplay modes, maps, mods, weapons, skins, mutators and HL2 ep2s content, and massive modding community. It has NOTHING on these games in terms of replayability.....

I stopped reading after you said starcraft is one of the most widely played FPS since 1998

[QUOTE="hellfire9988"]

Gamespots new nore generous rating system to give out the first AAAA in 6 years?

Seeing as the old system's9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9would now = 10?

I put MGS4, and Bioshock as seperate because they are being hyped the most (other than Halo). And I know gears is not exclusive.

Also, put if you think that Corruption Mario galaxy or -------------------------Any other Nintendo exclusive will make AAAA

:oops:MY BAD, I FORGOT ABOUT NINTENDO, IM NOT TRYING TO SNUB THEM, AND IT WON'T LET ME EDIT THE POLE... MY BAD, AND I OWN A Wii TOO. :oops:

marklarmer

only 9.75+ from the old system would be considered a 10 now, but bioshock has the best chance closely followed by crysis imo.

Crysis would never get AAAA, even getting 9.5 is gonna be very hard for them as the system requirents as was with sup com, will affect the score which sux but hey what can you do.

[QUOTE="Mr_Fugly"]

COD4 looks amazing we all know this from E3 07

And we all know that COD3 looked noticeably better on 360 over PS3 due to 360 clearly being the more powerful developer friendly platform. COD4 looks to no doubt be taxing the next gen hardware a bit. I think it's a safe bet we will see once again the 360 version clearly outshining the RSX with the 360 GPU'sunified shader and 10MB AA next gen ahead of RSX tech.

snorlaxmaster

Well it is sonys fault they hyped the cell as if it could run circles around the 360 however as it is beceoming clear, the PS3 although powerful is bottlenecked resulting in a similar experience as on the 360.

[QUOTE="HeHateMe_basic"]seeing how most multiplay games look better on 360, i'd say the real prob is the ps3. framerate is prob crapy. legalize3

who said they dont have disk space isues or hdd

look buddy you can point you finger everywhere it wont bring gta4 back to september im sorry

True but he can try for october

[QUOTE="Snugenz"][QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(Koalakommander

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Would anyone honestly run a game on minimum settings, i know it would just destroy any enjoyment for me....

That's kind of pathetic. If Crysis becomes a competitive FPS, I'll be all over it, low settings or not.

NO low settings usually ruin the game for me, I loved Sup Com but because my rig couldnt handle it with close to a thousand units a team I stopped playing it

Just goes to show that most people on SW have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to PC gaming. My rigs are about 3 years old, I'm expecting to run Crysis smoothly on medium settings. I don't need vista and an 8800 blah blah blah. Plus, it's not all about the graphics.
Koalakommander

I realize that you dont need a crazy $3000 rig or anything but how much slack will GS give it for having a fairly hefty requirment

[QUOTE="trix5817"]

[QUOTE="Caveman626"]I agree this game will probally fail at first because There are only a very small number of pc owners that their machines can run. So sad :(l-_-l

The games scalabe back to 3 year old hardware.....

Yes but because you need to be a gamer just to run it ber minimum makes me nervous that GS will shoot it down like with Sup Com