[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"][QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"] Why not take it one step further? If someone can't speak English in a courtroom, no point in having them testify on a crime even if they do have an interpreter.nocoolnamejim
The article implied that the man could speak English, he just prefered to address them in Spanish.
And there's nothing wrong with that. I speak a small smattering of Swedish due to being married to one. If I was asked to testify on something in Sweden I'm pretty sure that I'd prefer to speak in a language I was vastly more comfortable in for fear of saying something stupid due to my extremely limited abilities in my non-native tongue and have a professional interpreter translate my thoughts.Well, the man's been living here for 23 years. I'm going to assume he's become quite fluent in English. If you were fluent in Swedish you probably wouldn't have a problem speaking Swedish it in that given situation.
I sympathize with the Senator because it seems the man is unnecessarily complicating things.
Log in to comment