ImageChef's forum posts
If I could, I'd shoot HHG into the sun.
But for now I'll just say it's the worst place for gaming news imaginable. Just as bad as the tabloids that say "Obama divorces Michelle for Bigfoot!"
Yep. Frankly, it's like going to SonyDefenseForce for news and posting it here. Granted, SDF is more biased (although obvious HHG is ps3 biased-which is fine), but in reality, SDF does seem to understand what it real and not, and twists it absurdly, while HHG will resort to just making stuff up.Just post this in the FFXIII sticky man. You can argue about the screens there.AAllxxjjnnIt's frankly not about FF13. It's about the whole idiocity of the boards not having an sense of logic and completely being devoid of any sense of proper reasoning, instead gravitating towards the opinion of their bias, regardless of what that is.
[QUOTE="ImageChef"]Guys, understand this: Hip Hop Gamer is not a credible source. He just makes stuff up. Okay? Why is it that system wars is more likely to watch his videos for information on say, bungie developing for the ps3, rather than bungie themselves? Bungie's podcast says they're developing for 360 and will likely remain with MS for future games for publishing, advertising, etc. Hip-HOP game's video diaries say they're ditching the 360 and moving to ps3 and will have their next game out alongside Reach, but Ps3 only. Does that even make sense? Anyway, Please. I beg. Hip-hop gamer, or N4G's articiles linking to him, are not sources we should use. SilentlyMadSo Bungie themselves say one then and a person that has no inside information on what Bungie does says another. Why even post this since it is clear that site is a joke. But the majority of people here don't understand that. Posters tend to gravitate towards the one that favors their bias, not the logical conclusion.
So...FF13 still sub HD?
So much angry lemming tears.
Creating a level one account just to ban dodge really shows how confident you are with your own words, which is zero.
I don't have an account here. I use to, but don't anymore. So this is how you guys respond though. You're obviously oblivious to everything here though. Claiming .jpg can't suffer from varying levels of compression. Completely ignoring evidence such as the mouse pointer, the obviousness that it's a low quality pic overall, and most comical--> posting a pic with the bad cropping black border and claiming it to be one without. How can someone like you spot differences in such small details in general fi you can't catch that?
Log in to comment