@Rayzakk @DVONvX @Haeravon @JBcrazy

I personally dug Fable.

Mass effect was on there earlier.

Halo I loved and gears. But yes, the PS3 had Last Of Us... which kicked ass. :)

But again here we are talking about the "quality" of games.

The differences between the hardware to me won't be enough to make the 'victor'. It will still be about software. This gen is no exception probably.

The PS4 and Xbone are both 'around' 400 bucks worth of processing power. Nothing dramatic, especially in this world of scarce exclusives.

@DVONvX @JBcrazy

... Isn't that an opinion?

Graphically perhaps? Even then... I still see beautiful games on xbox 360.

In my opinion by the time last of Us came out.. which is probably Sony's best looking offering on the PS3, the eye candy kings reside on the PC.

The difference between the 360 and PS3 aren't radical by a long shot.

@stride21 Agreed... 60 fps needs to be the gold standard for sure.

And even after all this stuff... and over analysis of components and how much rma is being used... DDR5 this and that.

90 percent of the games on both systems will look and feel practically identical...

It's very silly.

Mass Effect 3 = 60 Dollars Day One DLC = 10 Dollars Reading People Who's Defended the Current Ending Read the GREAT News = EFFING PRICELESS Ah... now to sit back and read Colin Moriarity and all the video game reviewers spew their artsy hearts out.