JC_Spot's forum posts

Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"]

This thread screams "I'm butthurt".

Curiosity's the culprit; not trolling. In simpler terms, just because someone makes a giant sign that reads "(insert console) is better than your console", it is ultimately the reader/aka contributor to trolling's fault in which the situation is taken out of context.

One should be free to express himself/herself any way fit as long as it's not in the manner of being "directly offensive".

Not anyone else's fault if your skin's made of pudding.

ForzaGearsFace

so true, TC's butt be hurted for sho

:lol: You're the textbook definition of ban dodging troll.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts
Don't really care. They should make some exclusive console games so they don't have to worry about PC specs. blackace
What?
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts
Very nicely made, shame G4 is a joke.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

Crysis 3 seems to make up for some of the mistakes Crysis 2 has and is bit more in root with Crysis 1. Crytek claims they're going F2P and PC is the only platform they can really do what they intend on. Then again they've been going down hill ever since Crysis 2. Wonder what type of F2P games they're going to come up with after Crysis 3.

NoodleFighter
Meh, I find it hard to believe the people that made the original Crysis will be committed to FTP only games. Crysis 3 looks like Crysis 2.1 anyway.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

[QUOTE="JC_Spot"]Trolls from each side troll each other in threads which continuously bumps them and clogs up the board with garbage. Slashless

Well then you just have a thread full of fakeboys with nobody else paying any attention to it. Eventually the trolls will realize no reasonable poster is falling for their threads, and it's just fakeboy trolls playing for the other team that are responding to their sh*tty bait.

That or mods can just use there brains to determine who gets banned/who doesn't ect.

We can even hold it up to a vote, like a democracy. Like we're fine gentlemen.

Another thing, most people usually tell me they respond to fakeboy failbait troll threads because "they like to own idiots", when all they're doing is providing the attention these fakeboy trolls want; they don't get any in the real world so gs forums has to suffice.

You ignored the second part of my post which said they clog up legit threads with their garbage :|
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

[QUOTE="JC_Spot"][QUOTE="Strutten"]

Massive facepalm, nothing more nothing less.

arkephonic

Did you see the MS press conferences at E3 in the last few years? Most of what he said about Kinect is 100% correct. However if Move had sold as good as Kinect Sony would be doing the same casualization crap, he is wrong is his idea that Sony is somehow more loyal to core gamers than MS.

I never said anything about loyalty. All I did was state reality.

It's only reality because Move sold less and therefore devs who want to make casual games make them for Kinect and Sony didn't invest heavily in devs for Move. If move had sold a crap load and Kinect had failed it would be CasualStation 3 instead of CasualBox 360.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts
[QUOTE="JC_Spot"]Everyone online seems to have it. I didn't and just bought the CQ pack, which is basically CODField 3. Will not be buying any of the other packs.KungfuKitten
What do you think of CQ? I don't think it suits BF3 at all. Half the weapons are at a severe disadvantage, some have a severe advantage. You spawn mostly at random making strategy almost impossible. It's just like TDM really, with some CP's to distract you with and maps made especially for running around without knowing what you're doing.

Yeah it's way too hectic for BF, it's far more suited to COD. Often in COD you will see there are heaps of players at the top with similar K/D's and scores because it's so hectic it's hard to stand out really. In CQ it's pretty much the same. In other BF maps I gravitated to the top of game scoreboards but in CQ I will be MVP one game and loitering at the bottom with a negative K/D the next, it's too random like COD and the good players do not stand out because of it. You're right in saying random spawn has a lot to do with it, often you get killed from behind which hardly ever happens in BF when you're playing team games, and yes there are basically no tactics involved, it's just kill kill kill. Also, rush is my favorite game type and you can't even play it on CQ which annoys me, I thought they might at least have a couple of maps like metro that are CQ but allow for you to play rush. Servers with 32 players are hectic as but some servers have up to 64 which is just retarded. And yeah a lot of guns are useless. Shotguns are super common as you'd expect, but at least they nerfed the USAS a while age because it would be the only weapon people used if they didn't. I tried to stick away from shotguns but now I'm using the SPAS simply because it's so much better on the small maps. The Engineer class is obviously useless because there are no vehicle, but I will commend DICE that at least they have made explosives pretty much useless too, Metro is a clusterfvck of explosives which really pissed me off. Overall I think they're okay maps but could have been much better, I'm really annoyed they got rid of rush.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

Microsoft doesn't need to make exclusives besides Halo, Gears and Forza because that's all they need. They have the best third party support and they brought in casuals, at least they know what they are doing unlike Sony and the sales show.

Why the hell would you look for core games on the Move when you already have an extensive library of core games on the PS3? Also Microsoft would've been better off never making Kinect? It's made them hella money. I wouldn't say the Move is useless if it at least did that, but no it doesn't have games or the huge commercial success.

Strutten

The difference is that Sony is treating their motion controls exactly how they should be treated. Secondary to everything else. Sony makes a core game designed around the DualShock 3, and they throw in Move support as an OPTION. Sony goes and makes another core game designed around the DualShock 3, and they throw in Move support as an OPTION. Move is there as an OPTION for people who like motion controls. They aren't wasting their time creating a bunch of Move only games, Move isn't holding them back at all. They're doing what they're doing and throwing Move implementation into games that they see fit. It's exactly the amount of attention motion controls deserve, they deserve to be treated as secondary and the option is there for the people who want them.

Kinect on the other hand is Microsoft's main focus now. They're taking in-house 1st party studios and putting them exclusively on Kinect development, making Kinect-only games. No option for a 360 controller here, it's all Kinect, all day every day. People say Microsoft has gone 100% casual, and they're right. While Sony is treating motion controls as a secondary option with no focus on it whatsoever, they are Microsoft's entire focus. Sony doesn't even skip a beat because of motion controls/Move, they just tack it on to what was already a game being released with DualShock 3 controls.

Massive facepalm, nothing more nothing less.

Did you see the MS press conferences at E3 in the last few years? Most of what he said about Kinect is 100% correct. However if Move had sold as good as Kinect Sony would be doing the same casualization crap, he is wrong is his idea that Sony is somehow more loyal to core gamers than MS.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts

Here's the thing System Wars, if you don't like these trolls/fakeboys filling up this site then stop posting in their terrible troll bait. When something as simple as "OMG PS3 SUX LOL" can get 100+ posts of butthurt then no sh*t they're not going to try when they make threads.

If you see a thread that you think is just lame flamebait, don't post to tell them that, don't post your stupid spiderman memes/Ponies, don't post unfunny tl;dr gifs, don't post in their threads, period.

"But when we do that they just bump their threads!"

Yeah and eventually they're going to recognize no one is paying them any attention(just like irl) and simmer down. But I guess that's just SW for you. Compaining about sh*tty trolls yet constantly falling for sh*tty bait.

6-29-hahaha.gif

Slashless
Trolls from each side troll each other in threads which continuously bumps them and clogs up the board with garbage. Even in legitimate threads trolls twist them into being a PS3 vs 360 thread and clog up individual threads with their garbage.
Avatar image for JC_Spot
JC_Spot

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 JC_Spot
Member since 2012 • 431 Posts
Game looks good but SO much like BF3. Might pick it up at sale down the line.