@isimitaiwo: They already stated that they won't release additional mod tools outside of snapmap, optimism may be a good thing but it doesn't always pay out.

@peterhorner1867: After how bad the first game was it is no wonder really.

After how bad the first Homefront was I knew the next one wouldn't be any better.

While owners of the original PC versions miss out.

@slicedbread117: You forgot about exploration which the original Doom's actually had.

@AuronAXE: While it doesn't have the same problems as Doom 3 it still has it's own problems which Doom 3 didn't have.

Honestly I think an 8 was too generous, a 7.5 would've been more appropriate. While it does try to be close to the spirit of the original Doom it is still lacking quite a few things which made the first two Doom's great. The lack of mod tools is one issue with this new Doom also. I would still rather play the original Doom's with source ports and custom maps and mods such as Smooth Doom but not that god awful imbalanced Brutal Doom.

Why are people even complaining about the new BF not having a campaign? It's not even a part of the original series and the last BF which was meant to have a campaign was BF3 before Lucasarts already canceled it. The new BF was a multiplayer reboot it isn't supposed to have a campaign and they probably don't have the rights to the original canceled BF3 content.

EA has always been doing multi-platform games since the XB/GC/PS2 gen of consoles.