[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Ninja-Vox

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end.

Danced around what exactly? :| Also, please link me to Epic saying that the main focus of development is on the PS3. Until then, you're simply making things up. The Unreal Engine is made for PCs. Unreal has always been a PC game. You've simply ignored everything else i said with your usual "ah yes, but the substance..." nonsense.

Why? Because you know you're in the wrong. I asked him to list the shooters he was talking about, and you went nuts. Simple.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]thats not what he did,you would take 60GB over 120GB ?Ninja-Vox

One, out of all of them. I know you're enjoying shooting at all of my posts, but you're yet to make a valid point on anything i've said, so quit acting like a child, eh? 

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"]other than your smart a$$ attitude your posts contains no substance, but hey your a lemming i dont blame you for what you cant control ;) it was obvious what he was saying is it has better FPS than ps2 did coming or already out. we know RFOM is out, they are working on the sequel, we know it is getting all the multiplat games. and EA said they are concentrating their FPS and other games on ps3 cus of the processing power, we know cryisis devs arelookingfor ps3 programmers on their website, we know haze is coming and looks good and seems to be concentrated on ps3(not saying it is, but seems so) we know UT3 main SKU is ps3.and we know killzone is coming with the big budget and one of the biggest dev teams ever, etc, etc, so stop with your dumb little quips and get a damn clue.Ninja-Vox

Begging your pardon sir, but i just told the guy to get a 360 for the cheaper price and if he doesn't like it, trade it in for a PS3. Yesterday i made a thread on how disappointing the 360 elite is. But of course, because i'm not waving around a Sony flag i must be a lemming, right? Good show.

As for your post, if you look back, he said the PS3 has loads more and better shooters. I simply asked him to list these. I really dont know what you've taken so much offense to, but you've gone off on some god-forsaken tangent about comparing launch offerings of the PS2 to launch-offerings of the PS3 which he was apparently "obviously" talking about. Lord knows where you pulled that from.

I'd also love to know where you got that charming little fact about UT3 being mainly focused on PS3. It's not like the entire series has been PC-centric until this point. But hey, i'm sure they'd just turn their back on 90% of their audience. You're probably right.

To conclude; i was simply asking him to list all of these shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt. That is all. You reacted to something i didn't even say, and now you're stuck trying to justify what you said, and you cant.

The end. 

[QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

if you think thats unfair, may be because those FACTS really are the disadvantages of XBOX 360?

but still it doesnt make whatever i said less factual. free online vs $50 a year, its a fact, no more no less.

 

Ninja-Vox

Allow me to do what you just did, then:

"Aw man, it's a really simple choice. You're gonna get the core 360, right? Obviously....

So anyway,

Xbox 360 = $299, ps3 = $600 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 has proprietary wireless, ps3 has blu-tooth so you cant do LAN parties cause of the interferance (which do you want?)

xbox 360 has five AAAs, PS3 only has 1 (which one do you want?)

Xbox 360 can stream video and music off your PC wirelessly or through a LAN, PS3 cant (which one do you want?)

Clearly you'd answer Xbox 360 for every option. Because i've deliberately set it up that way. That's exactly what you did. And you know it.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"] ok so i get it, 6 months in and you want it to be on par with PC FPS, okay... :roll:Ninja-Vox

No, i dont recall saying anything even remotely like that. Did you by chance read another post, by mistake? On another forum? I remember him saying the PS3 has "loads more and better shooters", me not being able to think of any PS3 shooters other than resistance, and asking him to clarify this for me.

You get three: :| :| :| out of ten 

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]

[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Well you seem to really like the kinds of games that were on PS2, and will therefore come to PS3. And this time around PS3 has a lot more and better shooters, so you're covered there. If you were happy with PS2 but wanted more shooters, PS3 will be great for you.Ninja-Vox

Name these shooters for me, would you? :|

Fanboys...

A). Calm the heck down, dear.

B). I dont recall saying the PS3 has no shooters...

C). He said the PS3 has "a lot more and better shooters". I can think of Resistance. So i asked him to show me this plethora of shooters the PS3 apparently has under its belt.

Is that alright with you? 

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

in my opinion, i think PS 3 is worth your money more than Xbox 360 Elite (you'll get the Elite if you plan to buy one right?)

here's reasons:

1) DVD vs Blu-Ray (which one you want?)

2) no Wi-Fi vs Wi-Fi included (which one you want?)

3) $50 XBL fee per year vs free online and HOME (which one you want?)

4) 120 GB HDD vs 60 GB HDD (which one you want?)

5) old generation HDMI output vs HDMI output that support real audio signal (which one you want?)

well... you get the idea.

 

Game13a13y

:lol: That was so unbiased and objective of you.com/onlynot

I also love how you make no metion of GAMES on a GAMES console. Honestly, when you typed that out was there no part of your brain saying "this is the most obviously biased thing that is humanly possible for me to come up with"? And do you feel no guilt at all trying to influence somebody else with such horribly false posts?

Sony aren't going to send you a thank you letter, you know. 

dude, all i did was comparing hardwares, and you know i'm saying FACT instead of my OPINION.

thats why i don't mention games, because its all opinion which games are better then which.

[QUOTE="Jack-Napier"] yeah but when you look at upcoming releases on the wall behind the counter, and see the sequels coming for ps3 to all the cool games you loved on ps2 you will think a lot harder. ratchet & clank, SOTC sequel, jak sequel, gran turismo 5, GOW3, tekken 6, etc, etc. its not as cut and dry as you make it out to be. im saying this for anyone, i know this guy doesnt like fighters but im saying in general.Ninja-Vox

Not one of those games is out this year.  

[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]Well you seem to really like the kinds of games that were on PS2, and will therefore come to PS3. And this time around PS3 has a lot more and better shooters, so you're covered there. If you were happy with PS2 but wanted more shooters, PS3 will be great for you.Ninja-Vox

Name these shooters for me, would you? :|

Fanboys... 

[QUOTE="Hot_Potato"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"]360 has more games. Has higher-scoring games. Currently better looking games. And is cheaper. That's all i'd say.Ninja-Vox

The 360 also has been out longer. And price doesn't matter to him if you read the post.

If you're standing in a store and see 50 games for one system and ten games for the other, are you going to say "ah yes, but that system has been out longer, so it's not fair."

No, no you're not. Welcome to the real world.