I.. but...... what?? I'm not even sure how to respond to this.. lol

Also... Can we please have our real Turok back some day please?! Usually I tend to think twice about new games from older series, as they tend to shove in the fad of the day.. but here it may actually work well with the series. The world (lost world) is almost a perfect fit for a semi-openish world type layout. Or maybe not open but a large free roaming world. Kind of like zelda games etc. (less BotW or WW and more OoT and MM)

Then why are you making a movie about joker in the first place?!

Great news! That was such a awesome series. :D

Now if only I was willing to give even a cent to Sony again, at least until they cut the bullshit. :'(

This wouldn't be THE "Outset Island" (or ever an island at all) but a version of it. As the flood only happens in the WW timeline and that one leaves Hyrule under water. (for some reason)

So more "grim-dark edgelord to the MAX" then? Yeah, no thanks.

Ummm... well... Not sure what to say really.. I mean it's not like it's a problem, even if it doesn't make total sense from the outside.

"However, the disk in the PC physical version of the game does not contain the game data and instead just includes the Epic Games Store installer."

Fucking NOPE! Not anytime, not ever! That will be the day. If anyone sent me a physical "copy of a game" that was nothing but a proprietary software installer. (i.e. DRM and content control software) They'd be getting the disk right back again along with both a chargeback and a not so friendly comment/review!

@frickinsweet:

Yup, very much agree.. Especially with the second half! I only wish we realized this with gaming before it was too late.

There was NO "gay subtext" just a few of the (usual) western fans utterly failing at the concept of context and intent... once again. -_- But that's beside the point here really.

I'm not sure i'd argue that having a perverted or censored version of something is "better" than not having it at all, especially when there is absolutely no reason for many of the changes in the first place. At the very least, that line of reasoning is being used completely and utterly wrong here. Such an argument should never ever be the basis for attacking or discrediting people who point out the problems in the first place. Doing so literally IS defending censorship and or cheap/bad work!

@Firosen:

Indeed.. I can never understand that kind of new "logic" and narrative. "OMG those horrible fans ruin it for all the others who might somewhat care and maybe watch it.. They must be ignored... but really i mean stopped/attacked!" On the stupidity list, it's an argument and strategy right up there with attacking your audience or throwing them under the buss in the name of some other outside interest or POV. (or because of shilling)