JnWycliffe's forum posts
i guess world in conflict of the three. haven't played bia:hh. gears sucks. wic is pretty good.
my favorite game of all time is tf2.
Diablo and WoW are basically the same exact game only Diablo isn't an MMO, Besides that all Diablo and WoW is is a hot key game, press 4 until the thing is deadziproy
while oblivion features deep tactical combat? swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block, swing, block. yippee~!!!
elder scrolls? all of them? i'm guessing you mean oblivion, and i just would like to say that oblivion blows dogs and diablo 2 rulzzzzz!
[QUOTE="Makari"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Makari"]They're all expansions. It seems fine to me. We were okay with Sins coming without a singleplayer campaign at all for $50, so getting one + skirmish + battle.net multiplayer for any price seems fair.chrisrooR
Unfortunately from the wording of the announcement I feel that they will end up being sold as three separate games all for full retail price... and even worse, I'm going to buy them all. I'm not sure where I got the idea, but I'm pretty sure I saw them specifically mention the 2nd and 3rd campaigns would be expansions, with new units being added in and such.
It doesn't mean they won't cost the same as the full game. Look at the WoW expansions...all full retail price.
actually, wotlk is $40 (and i believe tbc was as well), which is $10 less than the price of a typical game.
Post a pic of your good looking Oblivion character.
MIYAMOTOnext007
there is no such thing. there's only weird-looking and freaky-looking.
What is your deal, _Memento_? The guy is on a natural high from beating a great game. Did your father not hug you as a child and this is your way of lashing out? Darkspur
he's very anti-valve, and hence must poop on anyone who thinks differently.
i don't think a game that features a main character that speaks is necessarily more immersive or more complete than a game that doesn't.
in terms of immersion, having any dialogue tree is technically breaking immersion; i don't find the main character not repeating aloud what's already written and what you've already read to be any less immersive than were he/she to do so.
in terms of it not being an 'all round package', it seems like a minor point, and i wouldn't call a game not a complete game just because it lacks this particular feature. there are far more important things that make a game immersive than the main character speaking. many of the older games didn't have any spoken dialogue at all, and i still find them more immersive than many of the rpgs today. for me, the setting, the world, the characters and their personalities, the voice acting (of everyone and not just the main character), the story, and the choices available to the player make for an immersive game.
Log in to comment