[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]You people act like only GS scored Gears of War high. The game recieved a 94% on GR it is a well crafted amazing game that is neither shallow or overrated unless you just don't like shooters.MTBare
You should add that 'yo foo was killed in a car crash'' thread to your sig. dude converge is awesome. I agree. much rock :twisted: props to you man. i saw them in hollywood, i had cuts and bruises for getting to the front. worth it 100% track me man.
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]You people act like only GS scored Gears of War high. The game recieved a 94% on GR it is a well crafted amazing game that is neither shallow or overrated unless you just don't like shooters.MTBare
You should add that 'yo foo was killed in a car crash'' thread to your sig. dude converge is awesome.
Now I know that Motorstorm and Gears are completly 2 different genres. BUT im just tired of hearing reviewers complain that Motorstorm is shallow when Gears is just as shallow. I mean think about it. Gears has only 10 very small maps, with only a handfull of weapons, no vehicles online whatsoever and is pretty much the same thing over and over again. Motorstorm is a racer with 8 very huge maps,WIDE variety of vehicles everything from dump trucks, to muscle cars and Dirt bikes, With 12 people online at once with full voice chat. And honestly, I dont see why everyone is bragging that Gears has 10 maps when people only play 3 of those maps over and over again. I mean seriously, everytime I get online, The only maps I see people play is Canals, Gridlock and mansion. I hardly ever see War maching, tyro station, rooftops, clocktower etc. Not only that but the campaign for gears is very shallow that only lasts 8 hours and very linear. Im not bad mouthing either game, Im just saying that these reveiwers should hear of the old saying that goes "the pot calling the kettle black" because gears is just as shallowRagingBull2584
well i guess your fact less paragraph just changed my mind completely! thanks for the waste of time.
We all know the PS3's Blu-Ray holds up to 50GB duel layer, but with DVD9, will 360 be holding PS3 GTA back from reaching it's full potential (ig: bigger map, more pedestrians,HD, sound) I'm just curious ;)
Freebird8877
if they can fit mass effect on to one disc, then they can put gta 4 on it. and i doubt hd gta 4 wont be anything crazy. and sound is compressed.
For those people who own both a PS3 and a 360, which version of a multiplatform game would you buy (assuming they are not dramatically different quality wise).
360 Pros: Xbox Live (if you already are paying for it) Rumble Acheivements
PS3 Pros: Possibly Better Graphics (not now, maybe down the road) Tilt, Sixaxis Playstation Home (possibly)
Other Factors: Controller Comfortability Which system friends have (for multiplayer)
idontknow1110
a lot of 3rd party devs do very little with the sixaxis. i think the 360 has the upper hand.
[QUOTE="mark4091"]Is your head alright after taking that mighty fall? of man perhaps?Friendlyfire53
RFOM was the most underrated game last year. it deserved AAA easily. especially with online up to 50 players with NO LAG AND FREE hahaha, what good is 50 player multilayer when it's no fun and has 0% originality.
MGS4 is coming soon. and it's EXECLUSIVE to the PerfectStation3. Ps3 has shown lately it is catching up from a slow start and will dominate this console war.Friendlyfire53
bump. some cows and lemmings ought to read this. i mean if RE4 looks that close to 360 on a GC and the Wii has 2 times or more that much capability then what?darth-pyschosis
Don't bump your own post. all the pictures are pretty biased. You didn't really make a valid point.
Log in to comment