[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="PoppaLemming"][QUOTE="Koba123"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]The PS3 is still in its first year, while the 360 is in its second....PoppaLemming
Good respnose
lol@ this cow
37 games in almost a year of life = pathetic beyond measure
I can see if the console was the 1st released of the gen but it wasn't... it was released a year after the 360 when most developers are now ready to make next gen games... and it still only has 37 games :lol:
lol@ shelling $600 clams only to have access to a library of flops and lazy ports
I mean seriously what the heck was the purpose of purchasing that thing? I'm not trying to flame but someone out there please tell me
Doesn't make him a cow. He isn't being a fanboy either. If anyone is being a fanboy, it's you.
He's just being fair and equal at the moment.
The ps3 does have a slower rate of which games are released. but that could be due to dev problems with the complicated ps3 technology. It doesn't really mean that the 360 is better, or that the ps3 is worse. or vice versa who has more games.
it's the quality and the exclusivity of the games that really matter.
And at this point the PS3 has neither the quality nor the quantity in it's library. People don't pay $600 bucks to "just wait" they pay $600 bucks for great games and gamingNOW!!!
The PS3 right now is one of the biggest flops in the history of gaming. Now it could pan out, but as of right now the PS3 has been nothing but a gimmic that hasn't lived up to expectations
Don't get the wrong idea, im a manticore at heart. I see all sides.
360 does have more AAA and AA titles yes. And yes, the ps3 isn't doing so hot at the moment. But neither was the 360 around this time in the 360's life. it's just too early to say its the biggest flop in gaming history when it isn't even a year old.
Log in to comment