what about in MP though. i mean you can clearly see in this picture the body severed in half...
h575309
hahahaha, no dude. First of all, there is no way thet'd put that in there. And he is not severed in half in that picture.
Forum Posts | Following | Followers |
---|---|---|
1699 | 30 | 7 |
what about in MP though. i mean you can clearly see in this picture the body severed in half...
h575309
hahahaha, no dude. First of all, there is no way thet'd put that in there. And he is not severed in half in that picture.
Quote-
Whilst I wouldn't compare it to Gears of War, or the forthcoming Bioshock, it certainly is a whole lot prettier than Halo 2.
Thank-fully, the games visuals have been cleaned up and it shows straight off the bat, the lighting is looking fantastic, the AA has been turned up and the game just feels a whole lot smoother. Other then that, the multiplayer is practically the same as the beta with the exception of a few tweaks that you can only notice after picking up the controller.
http://www.mygen.com.au/preview.php?page_id=18799180105731093&se_id=31&format=2&page=2
Lol, that doesnt sound good for the xbots.
killzowned24
you realize he didn't say LOOKS like the beta... he would have pointed it out clearly if it looked like the beta.
selective reading FTL!!!
try again troll.
almost all videos you've seen so far were played with god mode on just so you know[QUOTE="cyprus646"]I actually thing this game will flop with an 8.5 due to it's stupid AI and shallow gameplay but cows dont see it because there to busy looking at the graphics :roll:Ragashahs
as for shallow gameplay: "We didn't ask Guerrilla directly whether the use of cover would be all-but-mandatory, as with Gears of War, or optional; regardless, it adds a tactical element to the game that fits seamlessly with the Killzone mythos. Overall, the cover mechanic works extremely well,"
as for stupid A.I.(reguarding mini-boss guy): "We couldn't kill him to save our lives, but it was a pulse-quickening enough firefight that we gave it a good ten or so consecutive attempts before finally asking de Jonge to take care of him so that we could continue on with the demo."
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/levelup/archive/2007/07/12/world-exclusive-first-killzone-2-hands-on.aspx
just because they say the cover system works extremely well doesn't really mean much... GeOW's cover systemed worked extremely well as well...so did R6V's and so did GRAW's along with other games.
I'm just saying, just because it works well, doesn't mean it's amazing or revolutionary. I think cows should hype the graphics and lighting features more than cover system right now.
All I seem to read here is how much group "A" wants killzone 2 to flop and much group"B" knows it wont flop....
But why?
No game looks remotely fun compared to it in the genre... and Halo 3? As good a game as it could be just looks dull....I'm not trying to start a flame war but seriously...You have to admit it will be odd this gen to watch a Killzone game set the new standard as a Halo game loses its control of the top....and if E3 was any indicator....KZ2 a game shown behind closed doors, the very same night Halo 3 was shown eclipsed it in a matter of 2 hours....:|
At this point I ask myself if people are just saying they want it to flop or if there is some person or persons out there with no experience in video games...:|
SystemWarsBot
people want it to flop because of past history.
So it seems you condemn people for thinking KZ2 will flop...but you say it will dethrone Halo 3, a series that has proven it's self, along with a dev team that has proven it's self.
you're being very contradictory in your statement.
You say Halo 3 is dull...even though many respected sources have said the opposite. And you say KZ2 will set a new standard in the genre? I fail to see why, all I have heard is that here is a cover system...and really good lighting effects...I mean, maybe if they added a jump feature this time it might be a little more revolutionary.
But I see a lot more games, on the 360, ps3, and the pc that out shine KZ2. In gameplay, originality, and graphics.
But hey, that's just me.
I don't think the 360 has a chance to compete with the PS3 in 2008. 2007 is the 360's year as 2008 is the PS3's year. It's very hard to win 2 years in a row. I'm just wondering what 360 has in store to announce durring LGC and TGS. I think this a big joke if you ask me.turnpiketexas8
and you're basing all this onnn? PS3 had 0 huge titles for the end of 07...so they obviously focused on 08. MS has plenty of big name titles, hence why they are focusing on holiday 07, and then focus on 08 when you know...it's actually a little bit more resonable to start advertising and announcing games that are so far away.
[QUOTE="supermechakirby"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]is that really what you want to say?
CaseyWegner
what do you expect MS has been doing nothing but talking about its 07 lineup lately and now that its all coming through they will announce all the 08 stuff at these next conventions.
its not hypocritical its logic
do you not recongnize what i was referring to?
apparently he does not.
[QUOTE="supermechakirby"]Ninja Gaiden 2
Fable 2
Alan Wake
Too Human
just wait, moar will come after LGC and TGS
Izzy12345
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what a long list there, btw aren't both Alan Wake and NG2 comming to PS3. Let me see if I can come up with as impressive a list: MGS4, KZ2, GT5, Dynasty Warriors 6, and MGS4 online.
pretty sad when you have to say "mgs4 online" hahaha.
dude we get halo 3!!! and halo 3 online!!! :roll: nice try though buddy.
Now before I say anything, I love the MGS series...
But Sons of Liberty had the most incoherent plot I have ever experienced. I seriously remember running around naked as Raiden for ever, with no where to go. While people kept radioing in and saying the WEIRDEST most random crap, and then out of no where, after I was lectured by every who could contact me, a door opened out of no where and I could finally andvance.
I ran around naked for over an hour.
And if I EVER hear la li lu le lo again. im going to shoot someone.
Perfect Dark Zero. You're infiltrating a Hong Kong night club to recover a kidnapped scientist. Oops, now you're in virtual reality fighting someone (why actually fight someone in a game when you can fight them in a game in a game?). And now you're in Egypt for some reason. Oh, the final boss! And... you're fighting some demi-god Chinese guy with a sword who can fly in an alternate dimension. Worst. Plot. EVER.Hoffgod
I thought the very first mission was the virtual reality?
[QUOTE="KAS3Y_JAM3Z"][QUOTE="redandblack23"][QUOTE="dimar19"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]WOW TRY GETTING PICS FROM THE SAME SOURCE....ign's pics lookalot different from gs's pics
MY COMPARISON(SAME SOURCE):
PS3:
360:
redandblack23
Cows are the best :)
Do you know that your "PS3 pic"are from the first portion of screens back to fall 2006 and are from X360 version? LOL
link?..oo and how come if they are from the 360 version tehy arent on the 360 images??actually, the "ps3" picture location is http://xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/749/749817/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-advanced-warfighter-2-20061207013842025.jpg
...sooo...wanna explain that one? just look at the url, now enter that into your search bar. OMG! it's the same picture. weird eh?
sorry my mistake I'll admit it ...but ign needs to put the right pics in the right placesat least you'll own up to it. unlike a lot of other unsavory people in this place.
don't take this personally but..."owned" :)
Log in to comment