Highly doubt anything happens since you need UN security counsel permission to get involved (officially, overtly) with air strikes for example.[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]
[QUOTE="Jag85"]
The problem is that if the West (US, UK, France, and Sunni allies) try to pull any punches, then the East (Russia, Iran, Shia allies, and possibly even China) may try to pull some punches too. It's a tricky situation for both sides of this proxy conflict.
Jag85
China and Russia aren't going to vote for one after what happened with Libya. The Libyan intervention was supposed to a 'humanitarian' mission. Instead, NATO and their allies used it as an offensive weapon against Gaddafi only.
The Chinese and Russians both felt tricked by what NATO & allies did in Libya. No way in hell they will vote for another intervention of an ally.
I don't blame the Chinese and Russians. I also felt cheated by that Libya "intervention". I thought that, with the new governments in the US and UK, surely they wouldn't try to pull another Iraq on us... But it turned out they did in Libya (though not quite to the same extent as Iraq, of course).
However, the current Syria conflict seems to be getting deadlier than the Libyan one was. And there doesn't seem to be a solution in sight...
Yea I don't blame China and Russia now because they were tricked by NATO and the U.S. into thinking Libya would be 'humanitarian'.Only thing U.S. and allies could do now would be covert stuff. And I doubt that would counter what Iran, Russia and China are sending to Syria. We also do a horrible job picking the 'good guys' in these proxy wars.
Log in to comment