It's nessecary in games that require it. If someone is getting shot in the head, blood should be present. Especially if the characters in the game are supposed to be portrayed as real human beings.

Concerning fantasy characters like Link, Cloud, etc...who's actions SHOULD draw blood in a realistic setting, it's not all that nessecary. It's supposed to be a fictional game that takes place in a fictional setting, and otherwise is based around less emphasis on realism.

What the real complaint here is that there are people who will judge a game in it's entierty based on it's gore content, which is ridiculous.

Also consider the movie Kill Bill, 300, or the game God of War, in which case violence is so prominent that it's fictional in nature.

Seriously sheep, this is getting silly.Ninja-Vox

This guy isn't a sheep. He's just an idiot.

The Wiimote obviously didn't enhance the game for some, ahem the And about lackluster titles on the Wii: Escape From Bug Island, reviewed in that same EGM, averaged out at a 2.6 for its score. NINTENDO HAS THE ABILITY TO STOP THAT. THEY AREN'T. They can look at a game, hate it, and yell "Go back to the drawing board!"pyoob

How often does any game company actually do that? Don't you think we'd have fewercrap games on any console if that was the case? What was Microsoft doing when that awful Bruce Lee game was released on the XBox? Or Drake of the 99 Dragons?

Wether or not they have the ability to stop bad games from being made, they aren't doing it.

He said the Wii wasn't what it promised it would be. And all the Wii promised was to do what Blackbond said: reach out and appeal to a new audience.-The-G-Man-

HAH, and people said only idiots post on these forums.

Nintendo gives the getgo to all games before they are published on their system, and I'm honestly not seeing that Nintendo seal of quality on most Wii games out right now.pyoob

So Nintendo isn't promising us anything? So...how are promises being broken as per this thread's title?