[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

Thanks to adding onto my point.

FGMPR

look, if PC gamers would stop complaining about their game being downsized because of the mean ol consoles, then i wouldnt have reason to bring it up.

Battlefield 3 PC is good for gaming. PC gamers not willing to see our beloved series go down without a fight is good for gaming. Our attitude towards this has helped the likes of BF3 and Homefront, hell even Black Ops become significantly better games on PC than they would have otherwise.

unlike the consoles not all PCs are alike, Im guessing your one of those elites who can afford those super expensive PCs that cost more than most people can afford. The irony is that you dream of anambitious PC game that won't even play on 98% of the PCs out in the market.

360 and PS3 are powerful machines, they are better or on par with most of the PCs in the market.

Seeing how roughly 70% of GTA IV's sales were from the 360 ersion, I think there's a greater chance it wont be released on the PS3. HOWEVER, I think they'll simply keep it multiplat.charizard1605

ok then my question is

what is the cost general cost of a PC that is more powerful than PS3?

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"][QUOTE="93soccer"]Of course cows always manage to somehow bash MS. Obviously we all know it's MS' fault that BFBC2 doesn't have 32 players on consoles :| Seriously, it's not the devs or the servers at all, it's a company that doesn't even publish the game and isn't related to the publisher at all that's to blame93soccer

Who cares? It still plays great with 24 players. I'm sure DICE decided to put that limit for a reason; they designed the maps afterall.

Logan832

why is that PC version supports 32 but theconsole version supports only 24

I don't get it, I have PS3 and if PS3 can handle games like Resistence 2, which can support upto 60 players then what is the problem?

Does MS has anything to do with this?

There's one game to rule them all. Alan Wake

Animal-Mother

no

id say top 10. but its no way near #1. or even top 5. i mean, there is no way its as good as ps1, ps2, genesis, snes, nes, n64, or the 360. but thats just my opinion. and it still has lots of life still in it.

Microdevine

you lost me at 360

Alright i'm done. I was serious with my first post. I didn't expect such insecurity in response. You know it's true. The ps3 really is not doing that well. Any sane person would know that. Sure it's a decent system but hailing this the year of the ps3 is kind of ridiculous.

Walker34

lollzzzzzz

this is so stupid:P