@ flazzle

I already told you these are my personal opinions, I am not persuading you to agree with me

I said lucky not, because they made something terrible which ended up doing better then other great products

I said lucky in a sense, because both MS and Sony were caught off guard

so read my post again carefully

[QUOTE="flazzle"]

Also, they were the ONLY ones to have 100% backward compatabilty and did an incredible job of supporting their VC.
Anyone that concludes Nintendo is better of being a 3rd party developer is just plain ignorant or a graphics whore.flazzle

dude, who doesn't like better graphics

yes I like games with top notch graphic, somthing Wii can't offer

Regarding 360, how can you say Natal is already catered to the casuals. It's not even out yet. What companies have developed for it that you declare casual. That's right: NONE. Why don't you wait until you see what companies make games for it?
And also, a little early to declare Natal a success. If you watch the demos of the Natal closely, there are half second delays between fast movement. It's not perfect IMO.flazzle

Milo- scary, disturbing, for educational purposes I guess

Dodgeball like game- just like Wii sports

painting- nothing to do with games

everything they showed was catered towards the casuals

don't get me wrong, Natal is a jaw dropping technology, but I don't know how they will be able to pull off a first person shooter, for example will you have to turn 180 degree in order to turn 180 degree in the game, you know what I am trying to say.

Regarding PS3, how is the New Motion Sensing for hardcore gamers? What games did you see come out for that? That's right: NONE. You saw a demo of a guy using a bow an arrow on goblins and ticking the ribs of a skeleton with a sword. Yes, it looked cool, but if you think no casual games will come out for it when released, you are disillusioned.flazzle

we saw a demo of bow an arrow, sword fight,strategygame, and most importantly a FPS demo

these are hardcore gaming orentiated demos

MS and PS3 both did great

Wii came out in 2006

First of all I would make it clear that these are my personal opinions, I not urging you orpersuadingyou to agree with me, but if I am making a false statement then please correct me. If you agree with me and want to elaborate, then please do so

Nintendo Wii

To me, nintendo is the lucky bastard, both Microsoft and Sony werecaught off guard, when nintendo came out. Even though being outdated( compare to 360 and Ps3) nintendo pulled it off because of their motion sensing technology. Now that both Microsoft and Ps3 have come up with their own motion sensing tech, there is no need for me to buy WII. Frankly, I believe this is probably the last successful console coming from Nintendo, because I don't believe Nintendo will be able to come up with better tech than MS and Sony, this time they will be prepared. Nintendo is better off being a third party, with their arcade like games(mario), targeting their loyal fanbase( which I amdefinitely not part of). Games like Legend of Zelda would look better on 360 and PS3. Wii Lagacy will be of the console that attracted a new market called casual gamers.

Xbox 360

Except for the technical issues, 360 is a great engine. Even though I sold my 360, so I could buy a Ps3, it was not because I didn't like 360, its was that most of my close friends had a PS3, some of them had both consoles, but I can't afford both. Project Natal looks very promising, but its catered towards the casual gamers not me, plus I don't know how they will be able to make a first person shooter with this tech. I see stuff like Milo, or tennis like casual games coming out from Natal, not my cup of tea. Some really good exclusive games came out from 360, but none of them really made me excited, in other words, made be go back to 360.

Play Station 3

Out of the three, I thinkultimitely PS3 is the best engine. One reason that kept me rooting for PS3 are the unique exclusives. Metal Gear Solid with top notch graphics, great story, and the games play itself. MAG with its scale of 256 players, I love first person shooters like with big maps. The up coming games I am looking forward to are Gods of War 3, Heavy Rain, Agent, and many more. The New Motion Sensing Gear looks great, unlike Natal, this one is for hardcore gamers. PS3 has been very unlucky, first the unsuspected success of Wii, that came out on the same time with PS3, and the high price, we have to take into consideration, that the PS3 initial production cost is estimated to have been 805for the 20GB model and 840 for the 60GB model.However, they were priced at US$499 and US$599,meaning that every unit was sold at an estimated loss of $250.In January 2009 Sony announced that their gaming division was profitable in Q3 2008, and with third party like Rockstar making an exclusive for PS3, I think PS3 has a bright future.

God of Wars 3 on PS3 is very much 300

why don't people just keep their personal opinions to themselves

I think Halo series is very overated, but that doesn't mean I will urge Microsoft to cancel their most successful title

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

Xbox Live is very overrated

I am pretty sure most of these fanboys have never actually tried PSN

You can download old( from PS1 and PS2) and new games, download new content for the games.

I can communicate with my friends, and yes webcam option is also there, and it works fine

you can surf on the internet

You can also download blu-ray movies

and when it comes to online gaming Playstation 3 has done better then 360

Halo maxium 16 players

Gear of War maxium 10 players

on the other hand '

Resistance 2 60 players maxium

MAG 256 players maxium

and you know what PSN is free, Xboxlive is not

that makes PS3 cheaper than 360, cux your paying 60 bucks or more every year on Live

Tragic_Kingdom7

If your argument relies on something being free and the number of players (for individual games no less), it's not a very strong one. The strength of any service lies in its features and integration.

360 fanboys always talk about these features, but never actually tell us what are these freaking so called features you are so proud of

The more players doesn't make it better, and I'm not talking about like technically PSN lags, it doesn't but I mean its experiance, Xbox Live has full party chats, easiar friends list to manage, voice messages, worth the money HCKnight

dude you can chat with your friends on PSN, even webcam chats which I don't believe Xbox offers, and I am not paying 60 bucks for list managing lolzzz

[QUOTE="Khanbhai0"]

Xbox Live is very overrated

I am pretty sure most of these fanboys have never actually tried PSN

You can download old( from PS1 and PS2) and new games, download new content for the games.

I can communicate with my friends, and yes webcam option is also there, and it works fine

you can surf on the internet

You can also download blu-ray movies

and when it comes to online gaming Playstation 3 has done better then 360

Halo maxium 16 players

Gear of War maxium 10 players

on the other hand '

Resistance 2 60 players maxium

MAG 256 players maxium

and you know what PSN is free, Xboxlive is not

that makes PS3 cheaper than 360, cux your paying 60 bucks or more every year on Live

HCKnight

online experience:?

you have to be more specific then that

[QUOTE="Peaches1347"]I don't think sony will make those changes, better luck next gen sony =PDycras

your comparing Saturn with PS3:?