Killzowner's forum posts

Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
PS3 technology is only a few years old :). how can we know what we have yet to see. only with time will people truly learn how to use it, its still a baby tech. 360 however is what u see what u get. the tech is "easy" to use and has been overloaded, the to answer this, microsoft says it is against their policy to produce best results. what a joke microsoft.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
final fantasy vs 13 and demons souls says hiiiiiiiiii
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts

[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="navyguy21"]Your posting history says otherwise ;)navyguy21

i didnt know smart consumers that differentiate between better products have invalid opinions.

Whatever, Mr. "PS3's GPU is better because of clockspeed":lol:

Being an educated consumer is different from being a blind, biased fanboy. Its obvious by that thread, that you have no idea what clockspeed, or the differences between GPUs, so that doesnt make you an educated consumer at all.

it is just for funfaqs, really has nothing to do with the consumer from a general standpoint, sorta like talking about sales. ultimately it doesnt matter when you look at final product.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="navyguy21"] Dont fool yourself, your a proven sony fanboy, like you really would say any different :lol:navyguy21
i am a consumer, and as a consumer i look to all the options, i dont bias myself to just one, so i have a valid opinion like anyone else does who looks at something strictly from a consumer standpoint.

Your posting history says otherwise ;)

i didnt know smart consumers that differentiate between better products have invalid opinions.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
[QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="dragonfly110"]

err when have you heard that other then the threads that you yourself make?

from everyone who is excited about playing HARDCORE games with motion tech. it was fun for a while on the wii, but they just dont make the kind of games that sony devs make, and sony devs are already working with the motion control. Cant wait to see the game. Natal however is more focused on non-hardcore gaming, such as folder movements, pc applications, and casual dinosaur walking experiences.

er Im not a lemming (I personally think all 3 motion things are lame) but natal isnt used for any of that stuff that I know of :P How can you move PC applications on a 360 (unless you are talking about the PC natal of course...) its used as an add on for games (not completely take over the games like the wii mote) I mean Rare is working on it, you know its gonna have something good in it with them.

see thats the thing, microsoft has actually said they are looking at pc applications and such for natal. this shows they are not putting 100% effort of its use for 360 and gaming only. Sony however is not worried about anything else except gaming for their motion control. This is why i take them serious.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] The WoW expansions were quite different from Vanilla actually. They added a massive amount of content.navyguy21
i have no problem with the WoW expansions, the halo 3 one looks dull though.

Dont fool yourself, your a proven sony fanboy, like you really would say any different :lol:

i am a consumer, and as a consumer i look to all the options, i dont bias myself to just one, so i have a valid opinion like anyone else does who looks at something strictly from a consumer standpoint.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="Microsoft1234"] exactly, the drawing point for halo users is reach beta and the new maps, which is why its so disappointing that this will cost 60$ now if it were 20 i might cash out money for it but 60 is too much for me, btw I enjoy the halo franchise I'm not a typical hater (I play matchmaking alot). Danm_999
what were they thinking charging ppl a full game price for an old experience. Just cuz WOW did it lol. As a user, i would have much rather preferred they put there time effort and money into a new IP which would be much more exciting, but of course they want to milk the userbase instead.

The WoW expansions were quite different from Vanilla actually. They added a massive amount of content.

i have no problem with the WoW expansions, the halo 3 one looks dull though.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts

[QUOTE="Killzowner"]thats funny cuz i hear alot about sonys motion control, and how it is the best one for gaming.dragonfly110

err when have you heard that other then the threads that you yourself make?

from everyone who is excited about playing HARDCORE games with motion tech. it was fun for a while on the wii, but they just dont make the kind of games that sony devs make, and sony devs are already working with the motion control. Cant wait to see the game. Natal however is more focused on non-hardcore gaming, such as folder movements, pc applications, and casual dinosaur walking experiences.
Avatar image for Killzowner
Killzowner

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Killzowner
Member since 2009 • 191 Posts
[QUOTE="Killzowner"][QUOTE="Microsoft1234"]who cares? which one will be the best is a better question.....btw halo 3 odst doesn't look good at all. Microsoft1234
agreed, i think its just a quick cash scheme because of the user base on halo3. "hey 10 million halo 3 owners are gonna look straight to the expansion cuz it worked for WOW, lets pump it out fast"

exactly, the drawing point for halo users is reach beta and the new maps, which is why its so disappointing that this will cost 60$ now if it were 20 i might cash out money for it but 60 is too much for me, btw I enjoy the halo franchise I'm not a typical hater (I play matchmaking alot).

what were they thinking charging ppl a full game price for an old experience. Just cuz WOW did it lol. As a user, i would have much rather preferred they put there time effort and money into a new IP which would be much more exciting, but of course they want to milk the userbase instead.