The visuals on PC are very mediocre, and it also runs like crap. Its already been confirmed that the system requirements for COD on PC were a complete lie. Makes you wonder why they would lie about such. Maybe because of the horrid optimization? Or a marketing lie to make it seem like its a big new step towards next gen to get more sales? Then there is the whole 50GB install, when the textures are all low resolution...hidden files or what?
Another year another COD...yet on PC 100s of thousands of players are still playing a known FPS called Team Fortress 2. A game that came out around the same time Modern Warefare came out. That was a great and amazing FPS, yet all we hear about is COD this or BF that.
@groowagon planetside 2 is fun...Team Fortress 2 is still fun. Also there was a new Tribes game that came out a year back....Tribes brings back many memories.
Soo a game that never changes and gets released every freaking year for a full 60 dollar price tag, is deserving of a same score as a game like the Last of Us? Or Beyond Two Souls...Right....Oh who Do I care, I havnt played COD since MW2 and I tried to play Black Ops 2 but it was just soo boring.
For a game that has soo much focus on that dog, you think they would of done a better job with dog animations and visuals. The dog looks like it glides across the ground and its almost as if they just took the code of driving an RC car and replaced the model of a dog.
Kooken58's comments