Yeah, now I'm level 3, 29%. Sadly, after today, I likely won't be leveling up for 3 and a 1/2 weeks. My dad doesn't have a compy or anything :p. Oh well, I may be able to get on at some point... I'll be on for a few hours today, then I'm leaving.

Monday evening, I will be going to my Dad's in Scotland for 3 and a half weeks. I may be on until then, but after that, I'll be lucky to get on once or twice for nearly a month. I may give mobile contact information to trusted people if they want it... But then again, I doubt anyone will.

With the update that occured recently, my obsession with the website has paid off. I am at level 2, 12%, and hopefully the points will be updated daily now. I may try to clean up the Foster's boards soon, but for now, Frankie says Relax.

Why? It's because I've never, ever fancied anyone. I've always pledged not to until I'm 14 or something, but now its getting weird. All my school friends want/have girlfriends, and they say to me "Who do you fancy" instead of "Do you fancy anyone". Even here on TV.com, there are a few people starting to couple up. I'm getting worried puberty is soon gonna drop a train on me. This whole concept of love confuses me, for a few reasons. 1, There's about a 1 in 3 billion chance that 2 people will fancy one another. 2, I'd look like a prat asking anyone out. 3, all of my friends haven't stayed for long with their so called "soul mates". Meh, maybe I'm just too young to understand.

I've noticed a circle of ripoffs, and they have all managed to stem from the Pokemon TV show, funnily enough (I no longer like the show, just the video games, which completely rock). First there was Pokemon. Then, one day, the abysmal Digimon came, ripped everything off right down to the name, then one day, on the back of the game box, said "Beats Pokemon hands down!" How sad, copying something then putting down the original. Then came Yu-Gi-Oh, which, although generally said to be a lot better than Digimon (not to mention not quite as much copied from Pokemon) I never really liked it. It might be because of the whole card thing. There was a small similarity to Pokemon, though. Now, closer to the present day, the stupid show "Duel Masters" came out. It was a rip off of a part-rip off, and then described as "a game like no other". How sad. Finally, Beyblade. This wouldn't have been so much of a rip off, but thanks to the whole monster thing and the fact that Tyson looked a complete rip off of Ash, it couldn't be ignored that Pokemon influenced it. Now, for the most recent one: B-Daman. I know this was made by the same people as Beyblade, but they DOWNGRADED it. It was a similar show, though. So, all that was possibly spawned by Pokemon. Crazy, eh?

I'm sick and tired of hearing this. Everyone says that just about every animation outside the Simpsons and Family Guy is for babies. Well, as much as I like the latter, I am sick of this. Just because some shows have censors on language and violence, it doesn't mean its sugar coated and about some babies holding hands and giggling. Also, just having a certain title is enough for some people to dislike a show and say its babyish. For instance, Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends. This show drives a lot away with the words imaginary friends, but it certainly gets in loads of questionable content. "A bust this big needs ample support!" Bloo says as a statue is about to fall. I've turned over quite a lot of animation haters in my class. Help me by doing the same elsewhere.