Kurrupt07's forum posts

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Ok, I have ruled out getting 19 inch because i think its gonna be too small, i have found2 TVs which are the same price, if u had to choose, which one would u go for.

22inch version

26inch version

Chris_53

the smaller one has better res and contrast ratio though...its your choice

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

[QUOTE="agentfred"]Where do they go from here?REforever101

puzzle games that bend time, perhaps. i mean, portal had the whole bend space part down....sooooo

people are creative. i can see a few gems on the horizon

eh, i dont think many big time devs and publishers will risk a lot due to their excuse of "games are more expensive to make and its harder for us to be original blah blah blah." i dont agree with it, but only Valve and a few others will innovate more in fps puzzling

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

The PS2 had Metal Gear Solid 2, Grand Turismo 3, Final Fantasy X, GRAND THEFT AUTO 3 and Devil May Cry all in its first year. (2001)

That's what killed the Xbox and Gamecube right from the start.

BreakingPoint8

good point

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

I dont get why the Wii cant do at least 720p. Its crazy the Xbox (not 360, Xbox 1) had games in 720p and 1080i. Why cant the Wii? Makes no sense to me. I love playing games on the 360 in HD. Even games that dont "need" it look great. Games like Bioshock look even more amazing. Its a huge deal to some people and would have been a easy addition to the Wii. Oh Well, maybe the "Slim" Wii lolSpideR_CentS

uuummm, maybe because they wanted fun in their games..if you've been around the past years, you would know that Nintendo Wii isnt about graphics like the other two power behemoths. anyway, their aiming for the mainstream, and most people dont have HDTV yet, so..yep thats why.

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Because console newbs suck at FPS, and have to play the dumb down version on the 360. Finale-

no, actually taking into consideration of analog stick aim, most 360 gamers are ok at fps. why dont you play your crysis or halo or something with an x360 pad, see how you do.

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Heavenly Sword lost points for being a short game....well...WHY isn't Halo 3 getting any bashing for being such a short game? I finished the Campaign and it was just as long if not just a LITTLE bit longer than Heavenly Sword. And to be completely honest, the single player on Halo 3 is one of the most underwhelming Campaigns I've ever played. Don't get me wrong I really like the multi-player and online on Halo.....but the single player was flat out BORING. I had a way better time playing Heavenly Sword.

It's funny how nobody makes a big deal about something untill someone points it out and blows it up. People said HS was too short and then it's, "Not worth the money!!....Shoulda been longer!!!...blah blah blah" So then all everybody jumps the bandwagon and makes a big deal out of it. Gears Of War.....i LOVE this game. But that one is also REALLY REALLY SHORT.

Gage_Creed

which cellar have you been hiding in for the past 5 or so years? FPS games have drastically switched from quantity to quality(though, even then, only few FPS are very good)

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Hmmm...

http://www.n4g.com/NewsCom-72564.aspx

kokatawa111

hmm, and out of all console gamers, how many actually have a tv that runs native 1080p?

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Hi

I wanna buy a TV. I found a Sony 40'' 1080p with 7000:1 Dynamic/1300:1 Static Contrast Ratio.

Is that a good ?

I found a samsung with 15000 contrast ratio and the price is cheaper. The price doesnt matter for me. I want quality and better resolution

Should I go for the Sony ?

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-KDL-40XBR2-Bravia-1080p-HDTV/dp/tech-data/B000H6GFKG/ref=de_a_smtd/103-1354091-9079850?ie=UTF8&qid=1191640857&sr=1-6

Hydrolex

the Samsung may be your best bet, since higher contrast ratio means brighter whites and darker blacks. unless 1300:1 is good enough for your eyes

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Get ouf of here you stupid trolls. Stop trying to bash this game because you're failing miserably at it. Play the god damn beta (Like I am) and you'll see that multiplayer promises a lot. It's not just about graphics. The gameplay is just fun.

And if you're a fan of cs or Halo3, and only like that kind of fast mindless gameplay, then yes like you said this might not be for you. This resembles more like BF2 style. To each their taste but don't go around saying it looks "boring".

3ggman

its his right..... anyway, arent most multiplayer shooters these days mindless?

Avatar image for Kurrupt07
Kurrupt07

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kurrupt07
Member since 2006 • 554 Posts

Doesn't look very fun IMO.AdolescentDon

the first twon vids look rather drab, but the last looks cool