Because games start at 0.0 and work their way up. Preached by Kevin V, but the only one who takes this seriously is Tom McShay and he coincidentally gets most of the Sony exclusives. :lol: That's my guess.
Or MS is this out of touch with the online audience. Which makes me think how can I trust them with any of my personal data if they read their numbers and guess this wrong?
It's not about him - it's about all the dev studios that make quality titles, but end up going under because of companies like GameStop.
cainetao11
Yea, lets not focus on making games worth buying or anything dumb like that or trying to reduce costs in any way shape or form, or giving us games that nobody asked for, tacked on mulit player ect ect..yea,lets focus on used games instead because non of that other stuff matters. Then there is " I remember seeing pictures of Romeros Ferrari as a teenager and it MOTIVATED me to make my own kick ass games. " Can you buy a Ferrari with your current job? I cant. But the market has sort of dictated the tacked on mp. As the largest selling title sells because of mp. Consumers vote with their wallets and that's what devs have to go on. I agree lower budgets, but some production values will suffer and I doubt many gamers will take that well. "The Xbox 360, PS3, Wii are products, not spouses. You don't owe them your lifelong faithfulness. As game consoles, their purpose is to let you play the games you want to play. Anyone who willingly denies themselves great games out of some delusional desire to remain loyal to some massive, multi-national corporation needs to re think things." You don't think the owing is voting with their wallets?
[QUOTE="Heil68"]Poor Cliffy, I'm sure being am multi millionaire is tough goings these days. Miroku32
It's not about him - it's about all the dev studios that make quality titles, but end up going under because of companies like GameStop.
If they were quality titles then why people sell those games instead of keeping them? Right now I want to sell my Tomb Raider 2013. It is a great game but after you finish it the game lacks replay value. Even before this. You can only play one game at a time. Why would you have a library after knowing this fact?
[QUOTE="LOXO7"]Not a good read. He just rehashes arguments that side makes over and over.StormyJoe
The video link in the article says it all.
That video was hard to get through five weeks ago. It brought me back to 2008 when I knew nothing about economics. If I was still there I would concur.
Log in to comment