[QUOTE="ToScA-"]TintedEyes

You have quotes saying it's has incredible visuals, best shooter or FPS, that's not calling it the best looking on consoles

After KZ3 came out however that was consider the CGK in ALOT of places....so saying it is like saying it without having to really say it.

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] And if they don't say it directly i dont see why it was in the discussionTintedEyes

Based on you logic there was never a graphics king since it is subjective you are right however

Okay then how come you sig says "My God the X360 exclusives are so far behind me". Stated as a fact...

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="MC3887"]

Wow 1MS for all of that, so basically a ton of processing power was allowed to be used on textures/physics/AI, etc. How did they make the footprint so small?

Bus-A-Bus

Yea but still...1ms is like what...3% of frame budget for post processing?And ND told us that you can't get that kind of DOF in UC2 on 360 and now Crytek are doing actual bokeh?Wow...

The funny thing is how would ND even know?

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Not really, I dont call games undisputed graphics king, you can keep the assumptions up though. And no Eurogamer never called it the best. DF didnt either.TintedEyes

Again no one ever does......Never directly.

Based on you logic there was never a graphics king since it is subjective you are right however, that doesn't fly in SW you guys had it in concrete that UC2 was the best. Now that a multiplat has a great chance at the mini-throne you object to all these reviews?

I think T-razor1 served up the best ownage in this thread when he showed all the reviews that praised Crysis 2 for being the best looking game on consoles... Lol I said months ago that Crysis 2 would put an end to these graphic-whore wars and I'm glad I was right... And since when did effects != graphics? Anti-aliasing is an effect; dynamic shadows is an effect; Level of detail(LOD) is an effect; High-dynamic range(HDR) lighting is an effect; shaders, the variation between colors, basically what attributes to how "good" something looks, is an effect. Without any "effects" you wouldn't have graphics... Whomever made such a statement is just butt-hurt and delusional. Today is a glorious day to see one of the biggest questions in system wars history to be answered: 360 = PS3(Though most people knew this from the start)Vadamee

I feel a reboot when UC3 come out :cry:

[QUOTE="ToScA-"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] And back to the original point, not all reviews are saying it's the best, its gets a load of praise for its graphics for sure.

TintedEyes

Again no one ever does......Never directly.

[QUOTE="ToScA-"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] When did I say I cant accept people thin its the best?

TintedEyes

BRB U2 was never CGK because just because you guys say it doesn't mean it is true.

Wow 1MS for all of that, so basically a ton of processing power was allowed to be used on textures/physics/AI, etc. How did they make the footprint so small?

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Anyway I was talking about how KZ3 didnt really get that CGK praise from reviewers, not sure what your on aboutTintedEyes

I was on the other thing...He asked how come some people turned against KZ3 and you asked are you wrong?I seemed to get impression you haven't found it impressive as say UC2(which you seem to like) and I said that IMO you are wrong,because Ifind it better looking.Of course,IMO.

Seriously? The type of praise C2 got seems identical to UC2/KZ2, etc praise

DF>GS when it comes to these things.