[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Did you read the words in orange?

1Stark1

Most of them are dismissing it because of little things like "might" and "FPS". If KZ3 is or WAS the CGK and they say FPS obviously they are referring to KZ3. Also almost no sights ever say definitely when it comes to graphics. The thing is that is was good enough for cows at the time to say KZ2/UC2/KZ3, etc, etc where better. Even the ones prasing C2 like it is as good as it's predecessor, how do you know what settings they played on. They are also not taking into account the scale difference and what you could do in the first, just the look. Which the consoles can do to a respectable degree(not including modded crysis consoles get raped then)

Even if so, thats only a few sites that says that. We'll see game wins the most graphics awards this year.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Did you read the words in orange?

1Stark1

Yup, pretty much a bunch of "well this site said x, but not y or z" or "well this site said y, but not x or z" or "this site said z, but not x or y", or "this site said all x y and z, but whatever".

C'mon now, just accept it and move on.

How does that sound? If IGN said that Grand Turismo 5 was the best looking racer, does that make it CGK?

If the last racer was CGK.. Also it is more than IGN.

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

20 is a "few"? Ok then.

TintedEyes

Most of them are dismissing it because of little things like "might" and "FPS". If KZ3 is or WAS the CGK and they say FPS obviously they are referring to KZ3. Also almost no sights ever say definitely when it comes to graphics. The thing is that is was good enough for cows at the time to say KZ2/UC2/KZ3, etc, etc where better. Even the ones prasing C2 like it is as good as it's predecessor, how do you know what settings they played on. They are also not taking into account the scale difference and what you could do in the first, just the look. Which the consoles can do to a respectable degree(not including modded crysis consoles get raped then)

[QUOTE="MozartXVI"][QUOTE="Nolakk"] "It's difficult to give any really strong recommendation about which version of Crysis 2 to buy if you're in the enviable position of being able to choose between both HD console platforms." Son, if you can't read thats your problem.Nolakk

Do you really think that is common, that is obv the lowest point. I'd like to see PS3 lowest point prob 16-17 FPS. Pretty much teh difference between them in most areas in the game, favoring the X360 in that case though.

The difference between Crysis on 360 and PS3 would be like Red Dead Redemption, the 360 version being the superior one

Supabul

It isn't even that big but it exist.

I am just reffering to ones on console, not PC, and the ones that compete I mean (on console)

I mean didn't the guys at epic want the CGK crown back...and crytek just pooped on them. I don't expect anything outside of UC3 (I think it will look better than GeoW3 pure speculation) and rage will beat it. When I mean devs I guess ones fighting for the crown for consoles.

I swear in the crysis thread that there were atleast 8 sources, not including recent ones(today).

The only reason people bring this up is because of spite. For a LONG time all the cows have been saying the X360 can't catch up/will never have another CGK. Now that it has they are forced to eat 2+ yrs of crow. Not saying the lems didn't have a hand in this with GeOW as well, but it is fair to say sony started it w/ ridiculous hype.

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

GS is really slow with reviews man, I'm still waiting for the review of this game.

SilverChimera

Is unsatisfied grammatically correct? Or would "many people find them unsatisfactory" be better? (just wondering, no grammar police) (srs).