[QUOTE="dvalo9"]can't we all agree that the game is AAAA quality? it will deffo be 10/10 based on other reviews and is a great way to go out just like MGS did.toast_burner

Many believe the opposite, I loved halo 3 and others did to and we see possible AAAAe 60(AAA)%/40(AAAAe)% imo

[QUOTE="klusps"]

[QUOTE="RonnieLottinSF"]

GB's review was sad to say the least. Didn't expect much else from them.

emperorzhang66

Why can't people accept that not every website would give this game a perfect score? What difference would it make on you if the game actually scores a 5/5? If it makes people feel any better there are handful of positive AAA reviews out there.

Wait for it: BRB To much content

BRB: A.I is incompetent becasue of unlimited ammo

BRB: Plays like Halo

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Bungie should have used the Firefly people for this game. Although I guess Nathan Fillion makes a better humanized leader, than a "SUPER BADASS SPARTAN!!!". Then again Bungie so misused them in ODST, and that character model was insulting to the great Captain Malcolm Reynolds.

Karnage108

It is impossible for buck to be, you have to be an adolescent or you won't get any of the augmentations(Spartans get it done around age 12-14)

[QUOTE="MC3887"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"] We've enough from reviews, previews, etc. to know that there IS room for improvement.

A lot of folks though Halo 3 was the end-all be-all FPS, practically perfect in every way. Yet here we are with Reach, and everyone pretty much agrees it'll be better than 3. The same will happen with future Halo games, I'm betting.

Zero_epyon

Perfect for the time. Are you saying MGS4 couldn't be improved either?

@Zero, same can be said for reach what out there is really better?

Yes, but that is subjective I think Halo craps all over cod and I haven't played KZ so I won't comment. I have to say the only objective thing is the amount of features that have been well executed reach has them in spades.

[QUOTE="HaloReachGOTY"]

[QUOTE="mysterj"] MGS4 also got GOTY, that's more meaningful than the numerical score. It's still the best of it's genre today, rightfully deserved it's prime score.Aboogie5

9.5>9.4, how is this possible? Is this real life?

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"] " a game earning this score could not have been improved upon in any meaningful way." Reach can be improved.Head_of_games

A lot of folks though Halo 3 was the end-all be-all FPS, practically perfect in every way. Yet here we are with Reach, and everyone pretty much agrees it'll be better than 3. The same will happen with future Halo games, I'm betting.

Perfect for the time. Are you saying MGS4 couldn't be improved either?

@Zero, same can be said for reach what out there is really better?

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"] " a game earning this score could not have been improved upon in any meaningful way." Reach can be improved.spacesheikh

Also, talking about framerate problems...

[QUOTE="RonnieLottinSF"]

[QUOTE="racing1750"]OXM UK Review http://www.oxm.co.uk/article.php?id=22214mysterj

So with that review I believe Reach moves to 94% at MC after 23 reviews.

Actually reach has gotten TONS of 10/10 reviews since the last time meta updated.

[QUOTE="Zero_epyon"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"] How does the story compare to the other games? I heard good things about their stories but when i played it, they sucked.toast_burner

I've also heard people say throw away the nostalgia, reach>CE, but we'll see.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Zero_epyon"]

There's no way this game will score less than a 9. Sorry to all those hoping for it. From what I played the story was decent. It was just about to kick up.

mysterj

I think tom mcshea is reviewing this one aswell so I see guaranteed 9.5-10 from him.