[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
LOL this is a goddamn video game, not some argument about human rights. I just want you to recognise that I think Halo is much better than Killzone, and that the gaming critic community agrees with me, not you.
In regards to CoD, I can respect gaming journalists for giving MW and MW2 such good scores, I loved them games. COD4 completely took over Halo 3 as my online multiplayer game. But since then, they have been downhill as have their scores. So no, Halo is still the consistently better series, and Halo 4 will continue that trend. Killzone isn't even in the same ballpark. Sorry.
RR360DD
Look at his video and skip to 0:56. It shows you how blank and boring Halo is. :lol:
Killzone is looking awesome and immersive until that Halo footage... Now you gotta admit that Halo isn't a very good game if you're rooting for single player.
Killzones story sucks. Graphically it looks great, but its still a corridor shooter that I just found boring. Halo doesn't have the strongest story out there, but its still a heck of a lot better than Killzones. It may not have the uber graphics, but it makes up for that with vast areas with tons of features and a soundtrack that destorys anything in Killzone.
Then you can add the theatre mode, the on-line co-op, the skulls etc. which Halo has and killzone doesn't, and it just shlts all over killzone really. And thats without even mentioning competitive multiplayer, in which its no competition really.
Halo 3 (94) > Killzone 2 (91)
Everything you said was an opinion, not fact. The only thing you said that was true is Theatre and Forge. Those do not make it better or worse.
Log in to comment