[QUOTE="Mankyblobs"][QUOTE="petek480"][QUOTE="Mankyblobs"][QUOTE="petek480"]If you're a fan of the whole far cry game, you'd know it's nothing like HL. So don't compare it to HL. I don't know about anyone else, but i'm comparing it to Far Cry. When I played Far Cry, I was blown away by everything, graphics, gameplay, etc... When I played crysis, all I really wanted to see was it's gameplay, which was the same as Far Cry, otherwise for the physics(destructable enviroment and the suit). Yes, those were awesome, but got boring. Maybe the overhyping of the graphics by crytek made it a null point, I don't know, but when I play it, I just cared about gameplay, the graphics were important though, but not that important(I can play at hight settings, I have yet to try to hacks for vista settings in xp).petek480
Mate watch the video review here on gamespot, ...it looks anything but boring.
I've played the game though...I think that would be better then watching videos. Am I wrong?
Settle down mr killjoy. I didnt know did I, if you didnt like crysis you must have some odd preferences in terms of fps's. Maybe on-rails is your kinda thing.
I'm pretty sure I said that it's a great game in one of my posts...I just think they could of done more. Hell, they don't even own the rights to far cry anymore, they could of at least made it different then far cry, other then the suit.
Yeah it really resembles a souped-up farcry, but that not really a bad thing, farcry was the absolute boss. On a more civil note: what kind of things would you have had in mind? just curious thats all...
Log in to comment