MapleGrunt's forum posts

  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

"Harry Potter Wii looks as good as the PS3 version."

More like the PS3 version looks as bad as the Wii version.

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

This SUCKS.

0.5 increments are too general and tell you LESS about the quality of the game.

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

[QUOTE="Baird-06"]Trophies are only Sony's glorified version of Achievements since they can't come up with anything on their own... :roll:StarFoxCOM
tell me how they came up with duel analog?

 They simply doubled Nintendo's single analog.

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts
[QUOTE="lazzordude"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"][QUOTE="Owned_Noob"][QUOTE="Game13a13y"]

but if you bought all the add-on's to make it as function rich as PS 3, then it will cost more :?

HD-DVD drive, Wi-fi connector, bigger Harddrive, etc...

you dont need a Wi-Fi connector and the elite has a 120GB hard drive (only 479)lol stupid cow...

Game13a13y

ya, if you live in a very small apartment then you don't need Wi-Fi, and how about XBL cost? if you plan to subscribe it for the life time of the 360, i'm guessing 5,6 years, that will be around $300 there already.

 

so everbody that doesnt want xbl has to pay for it also?most people dont buy all the add ons to make it function like a ps3.if they wanted those add ons,the would of bought the ps3 in the first place.

look the thing is, PS 3 online is free!

in comparison, if you want to get as much feature as PS 3 with 360, it will cost you more.

 

 

If you are really that concerned about $4.16 a month than you can create a new account every month instead. New accounts come with 1 month free of XBL Gold. 

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

http://youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8

http://www.myspace.com/congressmanronpaul

 

Points of interest for gamers:

- He voted against regulating the internet.

- He is a consitutionalist, therefore, you do NOT have to worry about him making video game laws/regulations/bans. You can't say that about other candidates like Hilary Clinton.

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts
Halo 3 does not look Gears of War good but that doesn't mean that it doesn't look next-gen. I've played both Halo 2 and Halo 3 and I have noticed a big difference. There is no way that Xbox 1 could handle Halo 3.
Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

I don't see what the problem is with Halo 3's graphics. It looks amazing on my HDTV.

As for the Wii, lemmings (and cows) make fun of it's graphics because it can't do better then the Xbox 1 (and even the PS2 in some cases).

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

seriously I'm not lying, for the first time, trust in someone. Halo 3 launch date is November 11thalexin_05

Nice try. November 11 is a Sunday, video games don't come out during the weekend.

Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

first gen xbox titles looked beteer than late gen n64/ps1 titles.

first gen 360 titles look better than late gen xbox/gc/ps2 titles.

first gen wii titles look worse than late gen xbox titles.

thread fail.

JPOBS

I was just about to post that. TSHBO
Avatar image for MapleGrunt
MapleGrunt

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MapleGrunt
Member since 2006 • 173 Posts

Its offical Devs are not taking the Wii Seriously, and it makes me so f****ing angry yo............ Its not that the Wii cant make good looking games, its that the 3rd party Devs are just super lazy and they dont care about the Hardcore Nintendo fans, they think that they will just make crappy mini games and run though the graphics because its a GC 2.5... Nintendo is making all the good games and the 3rd party devs are just rushing everything, they are lazy and just want to make a quick buck...............

I mean look at Spiderman 3 for the Wii, 1 & 2 were good games (Nintendo Versions) then Activision makes 3 and instead of making a good looking wii version they rush it and throw some crappy mini games and use the wii-mote and they got a game, and it makes me sick.........

Nintendo is really trying to take gaming on a different path, but alot of their 3rd party devs are just lazy and money hungry to do so...

I mean come on

humcast

 

I blame Nintendo for not taking its own console seriously. The hardware is crap. And FYI, hardware is not just for graphics (sheep seem to forget this), but also for AI, physics, etc. The only thing going for the Wii is "innovative" gameplay (which can also be done on other consoles) and the Wiimote (which is not worth the trade off that Nintendo did).

  • 38 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4