Meedou's forum posts

Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
Yeah, I'm seeing 9.0-9.2 for the Wii version. 9.4-9.6 for GC.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
I PM'd LRG/MARCUS some questions which should give a good idea one way or another.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
[QUOTE="jechtshot78"][QUOTE="ScaryMovies"]" Martin has quit IRC (AIRC Quit: Leaving) * Martin has joined #gufupublic (Him) just to let you know that MARCUSFENIX user... its the same person (ME) ok (him)which aint me lol (me) Wow, ok lol" Just a question..How would he know that -LRG-'s alt account is MARCUSFENIX?

Exactly what I wanna know. Only a few people would know that off the bat...

He explained that to me, on a side note, he uses the same avatar, or same style, and Vitro told me LRG and MARCUS were both talking about wanting to buy HDTVs, so while HDTV alone isn't a solid base proof, in combination with being a new member, and having geow stuff, its quite obvious.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
I see no reason for VItro to lie, LRG/MARCUSFENIX are unlikely to be him, LRG had a fairly massive like of GeoW, while Vitro is more inclined towards non-XBOX consoles. I've had Vitro on MSN since he was banned, and he claims to not have been on since then, he used the same email he made his account with, so I see no reasoning behind not trusting him. Use of multiple accounts is possible to mess with everyone, but not enough evidence proves that.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
Wow what a little freak. It served as some entertaining reading material though, to understand how stupid some people can be.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
Is this some sick joke?MARCUSFENIXX
So are you LRG?
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
Its true, it is an impersonator. I've had Vitro on MSN since he was banned, and he claims to not have gone on.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts

[QUOTE="-Zaku-"]Sony Clarifies: LINKThe_Game21x

A little late for damage control now...

Well it is probably what they meant from the start, it would realistically make the most sense.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts
Lmao, I just did some harder limited mission and got a red ninja outfit. It looks HILARIOUS in all the cutscenes and while waking around.
Avatar image for Meedou
Meedou

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Meedou
Member since 2006 • 544 Posts

[QUOTE="-Zaku-"]This is pathetic. MS is sueing over this? It's nothing but a low end comparison showing what you would need to have the low end 360 (Core) to be on a similar level with the PS3's low end model: 20GB HDD, New Format Drive (HD-DVD), Wireless Controller, and what you would need to play online (Xbox Live Gold). All it is showing is that you would need those things to add on to the Core 360 for it to match the PS3's low end model out of the box.The_Game21x

If that's all Sony meant it to be, then they should've said so, but they didn't. They left it open, to be percieved in one of two ways, they way you mentioned, or the way everyone else percieved it, as a requirement.

So yeah, MS has plenty of reason to sue. If Sony didn't want it to be percieved that way, they should've said so.

Thats why its controversial, because theirs 2 parts to it, sony can fight back, but so can MS, if it was obvious one way or another, the lawsuit likely woulden't have been public.