Dude, the 470/480 are a start to this and you can expect all GPUs down the line to be able to run Physx without much of a performance hit.

Instashot

Dude the 480/470 have been a failure. The whole Fermi architecture has been a failure. It's 6 months late, more expensive, a lot less power efficient, produces more heat and for all that you only get slightly better performance than ATI 5000 series. That is epic fail no matter which way you look at it. Nvidia doesn't innovate all they have done for last couple of years is rename their old cards and ATI has now overtaken them.

In Q4 this year the 6000 series will come out an Nvidia will play catch up again. Nvidia will be on the back foot for the next couple of years.

Physx is a total gimmick that only a few games use for almost no extra benefit. And to use it you need another dedicated GPU to get any resonable performence out of it. Physx is also total fail just like fermi.

[QUOTE="6_volts"][QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"] lol,you again :P,my condolences for R.madrid being owned in the champions league :)cmpepper23

Half of those CL titles came when the tournament consisted of maybe 4 to 6 teams. Winning it now is a much bigger accomplishment considering the size and scope of the competition. Barca has won it twice since RMs last CL title. Also I am sure you were not alive for the glory years of RM back then so let go of the past. It must be tough to get eliminated by Lyon.

What a bad excuse as to why Real has 9 CL. Now they are worthless cause back then there were fewer teams competing. :lol:Face the music dude, Real has and always will be the best spanish club. Barcelona has always been second best in terms of how many titles they have won.

And the glory days of RM were not only back in the 50s & 60s, we were very competitive in the early 2000s. Sure we are not as good at the present time but I am confident we will win La Liga this year. I am pretty sure Barcelona won't win any titles this season, La Liga is in the bag for RM and Arsenal will knock you out. Hopefully no cheating refs like there were last year against chelsea.:roll:

Good luck on April 11th you will need it :P

Japan doesn't buy junk broken hardware that the 360 is. If the 360 was better hardware wise sales would be much better. Who want's to have a console which breaks down every year compared to something reliable like the PS3. Japan is used to great technology not rubbish.

Not impressed one bit. We can see the performance difference between Dirt 2 and Farcry 2 is far too big. We need to see more benchmarks in order to see what is the average performance between the two cards. Not to mention that they didn't use the new 10.3 drivers which is said to be a massive improvements for ATI cards.

Not worth the 6 month wait and the bigger price tag IMO. Nvidia has pretty much failed.

What's your point, battlefield is a much more established PC franchise, of course it's going to have more people there.

Want to compare Modern Warfare 2 numbers?

Sandvichman

But isn't PC Gaming dead according to console fanboys?

[QUOTE="monson21502"]

whats the point of buying that. when in a few months there will be something better and that will be half price?

DragonfireXZ95

Try Q4 this year when ATI 6000 series is released. It will most likely be double the power of 5000 series.

[QUOTE="Mitjastiskovski"]

[QUOTE="RAMRODtheMASTER"] Did he say he only owned handguns? Perhaps he is like me and has an assault rifle like my SKS or a marksman's rifle like my Mosin Nagant. Those aren't simple handguns, they will **** a person up with a single round at range. Besides a soldier is trained to take every threat seriously, even if they were only handguns pointed at you, you definitely wouldn't be standing there cracking jokes about handguns making you quiver in your boots. Many effective explosives can also be manufactured at home from common things. The proper people can make one hell of an uprising, only a ludicrously ignorant government does not fear it's people.RAMRODtheMASTER

Yes I am sure that your assault rifle and your hand guns would be very effective against tanks, fighter jets etc. I am also sure civilians with guns and no tactics are more dangerous than an army that is trained to work together as a team.

Not to mention if it really gets ugly, there are always nukes available. I am sure your assault rifle can stop all that...:lol:

The problem with your theory is that you think a normal US civilian can fight just as good as terrorist in Iraq. First off normal people would not have the balls to go up to a tank to try and destroy it. Unlike terrorist psychos who fight and don't care if they die or not is a complete different enemy to face than normal civilian. 99.9% of normal people would be to scared to do anything if something like that really did happen. People in Iraq & Afghanistan are practically born fighters they been raised up in a war environment and are used to all the **** that comes with fighting. You can't expect a normal US citizen who worked in a bank for most of his life to fight in a war without any kind of training.

[QUOTE="htekemerald"]

[QUOTE="XBebop"]

We have the right to bear arms for one real reason: to protect us from our own government.

While it's highly ulikely that the US govnerment will turn tyranical anytime soon, the threat of a coup de'tat, revolution, or Palpatine-esque power grab is always possible. If something like this ever happens, it would be nice if the people could defend themselves from said tyranny. If only the government had guns, controlling the people would be insanely easy. However, since there are more guns than people in America, the government will always be afraid of the people--and that's how it should be. A government that no longer fears its people will become tyrannical(sooner or later).

Before there are any "conspiracy theory" rebuttles, just go read a history book. Conspiracies have been a part of politics since the dawn of civilization, and they will continue to be.

RAMRODtheMASTER

I'm sure you and your hand guns will make the american miliary quiver in their boots.

Yes I am sure that your assault rifle and your hand guns would be very effective against tanks, fighter jets etc. I am also sure civilians with guns and no tactics are more dangerous than an army that is trained to work together as a team.

Not to mention if it really gets ugly, there are always nukes available. I am sure your assault rifle can stop all that...:lol:

[QUOTE="Mitjastiskovski"]

I don't know exactly what you guys are talking about, since I live in Europe but I would prefer to live in a society where normal citizens don't have guns. Why does everybody in the US need a gun for? Is there a war going on in the US that I am not aware of lol??? Surely crime can't be that bad.....

I honestly don't get the obsession with guns in the US, no other western developed nation is so obsest with guns. Guns are dangerous and they only give psychos a way of killing people. Every year there are many school shootings in the US, I wonder why... A kid gets a bad grade, goes home and takes dad's gun and goes on a shooting spree. And you people think everyone owning a gun means safer society???

I would feel less safe knowing everyone around me has a lethal weapon in their pocket. Glad I live in society where almost nobody has a gun.

magicalclick

Your perception doesn't mean a thing. But since you are asking why, read begining ofAmerican history in details about why it is estabilished as 2nd most important rights of a citizen (1st is freedom of speech of course). You can disagree or ignore their reasoning of couse, but, the fact remains that it is 2nd most imporant right of being a US citizen. And obviously people want gun control should move to your country and people want more freedom should move to US. Simple as that.

Wow so now you are saying there's more freedom in the US than in Europe? You guys haven't even got free healthcare, the number 1 basic human right any person should have.....

It's also somewhat sad that going by important things, guns is a higher priority than healthcare....

Anyway I am out of here, this is gonna start a 200+ page flame war now.

[QUOTE="Mitjastiskovski"]

[QUOTE="leviathan91"]

The reason why guns are so important is because our government actually trusts us to own guns. The original idea of owning a firearm was to keep the government in check but it can also reduce crime, though there is no denial there will be accidents. But then again, accidents occur everyday from everyday things.

I'm surprised you feel safe in Europe, despite the lack of guns. Aren't you worried about the ever-growing Islamic extremist groups in your continent, yet alone the lack of government action, growing unemployment, and crime rate?

RAMRODtheMASTER

I feel totally save in Europe. I been to almost every country in europe and nothing bad has ever happened to me. Only thing that has ever happen in my 20 years is that one time someone broke into my house and stole a couple of things and that's it. I also don't know where you get the islamic extremist groups threat from, there's almost none of them here or around europe. Growing unemployment is going up, all around the world even in the US and from my experience and my friends there's hardly any crime rate. There are hardly any gun crimes here in the UK and no school shootings, something that sadly happens every year in the US.

No I don't have any sources but I am pretty sure something like that happens every year since we also hear it on the news. I am also pretty sure school shootings in US is more common than in Europe