^ 8/10

- Assassins Creed Brotherhood

- Batman Arkham Asylum

- COD Black Ops

- COD Modern Warfare 2

- Crysis 2

- FIFA 11'

- God of War III

- Gran Turismo 5

- Grand Theft Auto IV

- Infamous

- Killzone 2

- Killzone 3

- Metal Gear Solid 4

- Motorstorm

- NBA 2K11

- Red Dead Redemption

_ Resistance: Fall of Man

- Resistance 2

- Street Fighter IV

- Uncharted 2

mammojo

Necro-9.5/10

13. Pure

12.Skate

11. Skate 2

10. CoD 4 Modern Warefare

9. MAG

8. Split Second

7. CoD W@W

6. Warhawk

5. Modern Warefare 2

4. NFS Hot Pursuit

3. Homefront

2. The Sly Collection

1. CoD Black Ops

But they look cool.

[QUOTE="favre4thewin"]

[QUOTE="DevilishStyles"]

You have no evidence that the game gets old quick, that's just an opinion. And saying theres no difference between that and MW2 proves you don't own the game. You're just using the same arguments on the internet. There is a huge difference between Mw2 and Black Ops, like there is a difference with Killzone 3 and Killzone 2.

DevilishStyles

Just like you don't have any evidence that the game doesn't get old, and your statement is just your opinion. At any point did I say it was scientific fact? Lets face it there aren't too many major changes bt/ the games. There are some, but not $60 worth of changes, just like the add on isn't worth $15 to me. I didn't say it was a bad game (sans single player), its just not the best FPS of all time.

Don't get so offensive, its not like you made the game. Its just my review of how black ops is. Maybe I like new games from time to time, but your perfectly fine playing the same ole format year after year. By all means if you think that Black Ops is worth paying $60 right now then tell the dude to pay it. I just don't think its worth it right now.

I think I maybe getting Dukem Nukem Forever(assuming this doesn't get delayed again), and Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Trilogy

-Vulpix-

[QUOTE="DevilishStyles"]

[QUOTE="favre4thewin"]

How much real war experience do you have? I m am going to go out on a limb and say none. Wars aren't won by having individuals sneak up from behind each other. Wars are won by tatical battles. You must mean stealth operations, and even those have tatical insertion points, not just ppl trying to run someone down from behind. The game is ok for a while, but gets old quick. Is there a real difference between MW 2, I don't see much. The strategy level to play the game is also low, but that is the purpose so anyone can pick it up right away.

The single player is bad, the slow motion is annoying, and it is also a very short campaign. There is no way it is the best single player FPS on the ps3. I don't see a whole lot of reason to spend $40 on this now. I would try to get it cheapier or wait for MW3

favre4thewin

You have no evidence that the game gets old quick, that's just an opinion. And saying theres no difference between that and MW2 proves you don't own the game. You're just using the same arguments on the internet. There is a huge difference between Mw2 and Black Ops, like there is a difference with Killzone 3 and Killzone 2.

Just like you don't have any evidence that the game doesn't get old, and your statement is just your opinion. At any point did I say it was scientific fact? Lets face it there aren't too many major changes bt/ the games. There are some, but not $60 worth of changes, just like the add on isn't worth $15 to me. I didn't say it was a bad game (sans single player), its just not the best FPS of all time.

Don't get so offensive, its not like you made the game. Its just my review of how black ops is. Maybe I like new games from time to time, but your perfectly fine playing the same ole format year after year. By all means if you think that Black Ops is worth paying $60 right now then tell the dude to pay it. I just don't think its worth it right now.

When you pack a punch a weapon like the galil and you get a red dot sight on it, sometimes it will give you a weird symbol as the sight. Do those mean anything?

[QUOTE="MoNsTeR_zAcH"]

[QUOTE="favre4thewin"]

Single player is terrible. Online gets old after a while. The maps are way to small and many games end up just being run around and get shot in the back/shoot ppl in the back.

I here good things about BC2.

favre4thewin

How much real war experience do you have? I m am going to go out on a limb and say none. Wars aren't won by having individuals sneak up from behind each other. Wars are won by tatical battles. You must mean stealth operations, and even those have tatical insertion points, not just ppl trying to run someone down from behind. The game is ok for a while, but gets old quick. Is there a real difference between MW 2, I don't see much. The strategy level to play the game is also low, but that is the purpose so anyone can pick it up right away.

The single player is bad, the slow motion is annoying, and it is also a very short campaign. There is no way it is the best single player FPS on the ps3. I don't see a whole lot of reason to spend $40 on this now. I would try to get it cheapier or wait for MW3

Oh, didn't know, just making sure.

[QUOTE="favre4thewin"]

Single player is terrible. Online gets old after a while. The maps are way to small and many games end up just being run around and get shot in the back/shoot ppl in the back.

I here good things about BC2.

DevilishStyles