what if nintendo screws em all over and drops it 100$. Then they'd be screwed.

wii-150
360-199, 299
PS3- 499

anyway this compitetion is good, this way I can get a 360 for a bit cheaper.

its in our warehouse I almost stole a copy to test it out

[QUOTE="JordanKid"][QUOTE="Velric"]

[QUOTE="dstryr13"]how can you go wrong with something that is made by the guys that made Golden Eyevip3r666

And Timesplitters.

Good+bad=not bad? good news? lol

timesplitters wasnt THAT bad. it was ok

goldeneye was great as was TS 2. TS3 was alright but 2 is still a fun game

The Wii is great for gamers with low standards. Its like the Network TV version of sitcoms. Lots of people watch them even though they are terrible.WheresMyChippy

that sir, is nice

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]I think the point is that blu ray discs cost more than dvd9s, so why do they cost the samewhoisryanmack

becuase we're talking about 1 cent versus 2 cents...probably even less.

dvds are much cheaper than blu ray discs

We're talking cost to produce here. That is the only number that would matter in feeling "ripped off".

production is the same across the board but if the format that the content is put on, you'd think mass production of these would warrant a few dollars shaved off the retail price

Why? You're paying for development cost, liscensing fees, marketing, etc...the price or format of the actual plastic disc is insignificant compared to that. Further, who's to say that 60 bucks isn't a steal?

putting content on a few million blu ray discs would cost a pretty penny, it would be slightly cheaper to do so on a dvd. If you took the difference out of the retail price there has to be some room for a cut

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="whitetiger3521"][QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="whitetiger3521"]

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]I think the point is that blu ray discs cost more than dvd9s, so why do they cost the samewhitetiger3521

Because people will just complain even more and Blu-Ray sales would be even worse

exactly, wouldn't MS want this?

Ya but if they make more money on software then it's good for them and 3rd party's.. Development costs on DVD9's are cheaper than it would be for Blu-Ray as well.

they could still turn a profit and hurt sony a bit if they were to lower the price even if only by 5 or so dollars

I highly doubt $5 would make that much of a major difference. $10 would however

If I saw the exact same game for two different consoles but one was 5 bucks cheaper I would definetly go for the cheaper of the two. Imagine if you buy six games the same amount of money would only be able to get 5 games on the opposing console

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"]

Do you feel as if your being ripped off? I mean it's just a plain ole dvd disc. At least PS3 owners get Blu-Ray formatted disc with 5 times more space. Seams like MS is taking advantage of its customers.

Supafly1

Oh? So you really think that bigger space means longer games? Don't be ridicilous. Up til now PS3 games have been pretty short.

its not all about game length, it plays a role but being able to have uncompressed audio and not having to compress everything is nice

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

[QUOTE="MorisUkunRasik"]I think the point is that blu ray discs cost more than dvd9s, so why do they cost the samewhoisryanmack

becuase we're talking about 1 cent versus 2 cents...probably even less.

dvds are much cheaper than blu ray discs

We're talking cost to produce here. That is the only number that would matter in feeling "ripped off".

production is the same across the board but if the format that the content is put on, you'd think mass production of these would warrant a few dollars shaved off the retail price