@Commander_Snowy @bluebird08 @Shango4 Haha, brilliant.

@Jennaralize @MoronGotMyName But you still haven't been as productive as Adam Orth.

@Jennaralize @MoronGotMyName Being this creative takes its toll.

@Jennaralize Lol, the jokes are getting a bit desperate now but that has its own comedy value.

I want to make a few more points as to why always online is a fucking horrible idea (as if it's needed):

1) This will give MS the freedom to make any released game unplayable at any time, depending on their whim. Look at the "Too Human" situation, they would have blocked that game server side with this scheme and cut off everyone from playing it - and they could do so to any game for whatever reason the idiots at MS may come up with (we are not talking geniuses here).

2) If your account gets banned for whatever reason you can't play your games any longer. Everyone knows some account bans are arbitrary and even if the ban is legit, shutting people out from playing their single player games is way beyond what's acceptable.

@Jackier039xop Nice discount

@no_pants_4_u The idiots still won't stop this shitstorm by saying: "It will not require an always on connection" - it almost seems like they desperately hope the internet will come around and embrace the idea before they announce it.

@HerbalVideogame Well, he tweeted this: "I haven't yet taken any particularly stand on the always-online Xbox rumors" - so he is not sure if he is on our side or Adam Orth's yet - apparently that's a tough call to make.

@omar_q Then you haven't been reading enough of them - plenty of people have explained why it's unacceptable to add a potential hurdle to consoles and why we don't enjoy bending over to Microsoft's desire to control our gaming habits.

@Kingfish1982 HAHAHAHA benefits? You mean online players are so moronic they will forget to connect without it being always online? Because that's the only "benefit" forced online could provide - genius.