@Zombie97 because only some European countries can match or exceed the US quality of life.

@Zombie97 fairness is not something to be expected from economics, because everyone has their own understanding of what's fair.

@plastiqueworld 50/100 is generally considered a failed test. 65/100 is generally considered to be enough for passing it, while Bs and As are ranging from 75 and above. So yeah, generally 7/3.5/70 is pretty damn average if not slightly bad. Movies that get below 70 are considered B-movies and while watchable by fans of the genre are not something that would be considered a good one. So no, 7/10 is not equivalent to good, it's equivalent to functional/passable/readable/watchable.

@DanCStarkey he doesn't say that NV made minigames go away. But NV is still much more superior in terms of writing and design.

The last couple of paragraphs about FO3 are ridiculous. Minigames, ridiculous and illogical locales, plot holes, drab and samey locations, almost non-existent characters, dumb dialogue and cheap cliched plot, that's what FO3 is. FONV has corrected the most of these flaws, but Wasteland 2 is by no means less believable and living world than FO3, not even by wide margin.

@plastiqueworld 7/10 is like 3.5/5 - the very definition of average, maybe slightly better.

@Zombie97 because pays are bigger in Europe

@Sevenizz most are id iots, so that still doesn't say a lot.

It's the best looking game of XB1, which isn't saying a lot.

@berethor099 oh if MP3 was utter shi t for you, then this pile of steaming garbage looks right up your alley.