MrBetterThenYou's forum posts

Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="Plug1Plug2"]

Is it just the price? Lack of decent games? The archaic controller?

Please give me your opinions.

Thanks.

Silvereign


Why is the Wii graphics Failing so Miserably?

Is it just the CPU? Lack of a better GPU? The gimmicky controller?

Please give me your opinions.

Why is the 360's hardware Failing so Miserably?

Was it just thrown to together? Lack of a better hardware manufacturer? The dreaded ring of death.

Please give me your opinions.

It's not about the specs.......it's about the games That's why they are called video games and not spec comparisons How do graphics fail miserably? That has to be one of the stupidest things I have ever heard. It's a video game console, not an art show. The 360's harware is 'failing' because they have sold enough units to have some break If the PS3 sold enough units we would be complaining about its shoddy hardware. Why dont you mention the problems with developing games on the cell? Fanboy much? I want all the systems to do well so competition forces devs to make better games and come up with new ideas You seem to want the status quo. Thats just boring.
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="MrBetterThenYou"] Your reply rides the short bus to school Re-read my post and try again

You said my logic fails because it's full of what is and maybes but it has to because first we are arguing about a game that's not out and second there is not official 360 version, also as you can see I'm making judgements on past ports. Do some search on the Cell and I'm sure you will find at least one advantage (more stuff going on at a same time than a normal processor can, to name one) no matter if you consider that it's superfluous.

Correction, You are arguing about a game that does not exist, We are talking about the email asking if we would like to see it ported, It's called being on topic I do not need to read a Sony PR sheet to tell me that their cell is the bee's knee's, I know they think that. If you really want to argue that it is not possible to port MGS4 to the 360 please provide some proof and not your opinions You see, the big difference is that we are talking about the possibility (what if/maybe) of a game getting ported You are saying that it cannot be ported due to(what if/maybe) In other words you are trying to argue that there is no possibility of the game being ported due to reasons that are based on what if's and maybe's The game either will be ported or will not, your arguements against porting are not based on anything factual therefore your arguement is faulty If you cannot see how your logic is faulty then I just feel bad for you
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
Its all about the cost of the system The average consumer is not willing to spend a couple of hundered more dollars for a system with couple of more features The PS3 has unproven tech (Blue Ray) that few average people have heard of (or care about for that matter) and they would rather wait out the format war than be forced to have something that may be obsolete long before the new next gen begins Personally I spend more on any product that might do a few things marginally better (the PS3 has yet to prove that it can out do the 360) If the PS3 can out do the 360 and show it they have to make sure that people are willing to spend that much more money for a system that plays primarily the same games
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
Without any online, no good single player other than zelda, and the worst versions of third party games, are you still playing your wii?  I have one, and no one plays it in my home.  We went to blockbuster, and my stepson rented gamecube games and xbox games instead of wii games.  He's always wanting to play the 360 and I asked him if he wanted to sell it on ebay, he said no, but I think he thought he would disappoint me if he said yeah, since I waited in the cold overnight for one.treyeumph
(Sarcasm On!) What a great topic Perhaps you should buy your stepson some rechargable batteries so he can play with his Wii If you are going to sell it prepare for a massive loss of cash. Nobody wants a Wii, they are so easy to find, most likely due to the great reasons you provided. I wish my dad would offer to sell my Wii but at the ripe age of 27 he just dosent feel like driving to my apartment to sell something that nobody wants because it has no online, and no good single player games other than Zelda, not to mention the worst versions of third party games. Perhaps I can use it to throw at people that make topics like this! If only the console had a faulty wriststrap too! (Sarcasm Off!)
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="MrBetterThenYou"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="MrBetterThenYou"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"] But being better is an opinion! Motion sensing is good when thought out before hand and not tacked onto a console like the PS3. I am glad it has it but in all reality it does not change the game that much. I doubt anyone would complain about the 360 version lacking motion sensing! So in essence both would be equally good based on the person playing,

It's not really an opinion if you get what I mean. They are focusing on using Motion sensing for the game, considering it's Kojima pro. we could assume they would make something cool (snapping necks and stuff on it already sounds great) Then again it would be the rumble that would be tacked down on a 360 ver. Again it's not just controls. [QUOTE="itsallgood29"] Also you must realize that the software used to make MGS4 is the same software they use to make the 360 games. Making it MP is just a hassle not and ordeal and if Konami can make lots of money with a 360 version then they will.

What do you mean by software? If Kojima decides to take a considerable advantage of the cell for some physics he planned and even won't be able to do 100% (as he said) and other stuff as he mentioning using the 50GB BR. Even though it could be up to compression on DVD, BD already has 3 disc and doing all that just to fit it would be a hassle or bad port.

The problem with your arguement is that it relies soley on 'maybes' and 'what if's' And just for the record BR does not hold 50GB yet and it will not for quite some time

Yea and the 360 port is a fact right? It's a ''what if'' maybe'' Well Phill Harrison said that the PS3 might use in the future the dual layered BR (or are they imaginary?) and Kojima said he is in talks to see if it can be used on MGS4, I forgot the interview. [QUOTE="Xbox360gamer1"]

Kojimas last MGS game as well
He is then moving onto Wii

He's gonna mke ''something'' for the Wii also said he is interested on 360 and is looking onto PC.

The topic is about the email getting sent out asking if we would be interested in a port Disputing the possibility of it being ported by 'what if or maybe' is not relevant to the topic You might as well say that it will not be ported because your daddy told you so

You might as well say a 360 version would be better because you were in the future and played both versions. So we have to use the what if, as you already pointed.

Your reply rides the short bus to school Re-read my post and try again
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"] Take advantage of the cell, please tell me you didn't buy into the whole supercomputer thing? Come on man are you like 13 years old. The cell is no magic bullet that will allow huge advances in gaming. Blu-ray is nice but Kojima only wants it for his long winded and confusing cutscenes, and even if the game would come on 2 or 3 standard DVD's who cares I personally dont mind getting my butt of the couch to change a disc. Parsing game data onto multiple disc is an easy process..........please do your homework!

When did I said the Cell was magic? But saying it has no advantages whatsoever is just dumb. Just because of the hype now if you mention the words ''advantage of the cell'' you are a ignorant fanboy. Give me a break.

What advantages does the cell have? I mean other than people saying it has some sort of advantage does not mean it actually does Perhaps you can demonstrate how this so called 'cell' can do things that no other gaming system can?
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="MrBetterThenYou"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"] But being better is an opinion! Motion sensing is good when thought out before hand and not tacked onto a console like the PS3. I am glad it has it but in all reality it does not change the game that much. I doubt anyone would complain about the 360 version lacking motion sensing! So in essence both would be equally good based on the person playing,

It's not really an opinion if you get what I mean. They are focusing on using Motion sensing for the game, considering it's Kojima pro. we could assume they would make something cool (snapping necks and stuff on it already sounds great) Then again it would be the rumble that would be tacked down on a 360 ver. Again it's not just controls. [QUOTE="itsallgood29"] Also you must realize that the software used to make MGS4 is the same software they use to make the 360 games. Making it MP is just a hassle not and ordeal and if Konami can make lots of money with a 360 version then they will.

What do you mean by software? If Kojima decides to take a considerable advantage of the cell for some physics he planned and even won't be able to do 100% (as he said) and other stuff as he mentioning using the 50GB BR. Even though it could be up to compression on DVD, BD already has 3 disc and doing all that just to fit it would be a hassle or bad port.

The problem with your arguement is that it relies soley on 'maybes' and 'what if's' And just for the record BR does not hold 50GB yet and it will not for quite some time

Yea and the 360 port is a fact right? It's a ''what if'' maybe'' Well Phill Harrison said that the PS3 might use in the future the dual layered BR (or are they imaginary?) and Kojima said he is in talks to see if it can be used on MGS4, I forgot the interview. [QUOTE="Xbox360gamer1"]

Kojimas last MGS game as well
He is then moving onto Wii

He's gonna mke ''something'' for the Wii also said he is interested on 360 and is looking onto PC.

The topic is about the email getting sent out asking if we would be interested in a port Disputing the possibility of it being ported by 'what if or maybe' is not relevant to the topic You might as well say that it will not be ported because your daddy told you so
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="itsallgood29"][QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"] But being better is an opinion! Motion sensing is good when thought out before hand and not tacked onto a console like the PS3. I am glad it has it but in all reality it does not change the game that much. I doubt anyone would complain about the 360 version lacking motion sensing! So in essence both would be equally good based on the person playing,

It's not really an opinion if you get what I mean. They are focusing on using Motion sensing for the game, considering it's Kojima pro. we could assume they would make something cool (snapping necks and stuff on it already sounds great) Then again it would be the rumble that would be tacked down on a 360 ver. Again it's not just controls. [QUOTE="itsallgood29"] Also you must realize that the software used to make MGS4 is the same software they use to make the 360 games. Making it MP is just a hassle not and ordeal and if Konami can make lots of money with a 360 version then they will.

What do you mean by software? If Kojima decides to take a considerable advantage of the cell for some physics he planned and even won't be able to do 100% (as he said) and other stuff as he mentioning using the 50GB BR. Even though it could be up to compression on DVD, BD already has 3 disc and doing all that just to fit it would be a hassle or bad port.

Take advantage of the cell, please tell me you didn't buy into the whole supercomputer thing? Come on man are you like 13 years old. The cell is no magic bullet that will allow huge advances in gaming. Blu-ray is nice but Kojima only wants it for his long winded and confusing cutscenes, and even if the game would come on 2 or 3 standard DVD's who cares I personally dont mind getting my butt of the couch to change a disc. Parsing game data onto multiple disc is an easy process..........please do your homework!

Great Post and good points I changed disks for all of the Final Fantasy's and the original MGS for the PSX and there was no problem at all There are only two times you will ever have to get up and change a disk 1: you have completed one disk and must insert another 2: when changing from a different game to the game in question In the enitre lifespan of the PSX and the games I have mentioned I only had to change disks about 10 times under the first scenario Changing disks will never be an issue in this gen
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
[QUOTE="tegovoltio"][QUOTE="itsallgood29"] But being better is an opinion! Motion sensing is good when thought out before hand and not tacked onto a console like the PS3. I am glad it has it but in all reality it does not change the game that much. I doubt anyone would complain about the 360 version lacking motion sensing! So in essence both would be equally good based on the person playing,

It's not really an opinion if you get what I mean. They are focusing on using Motion sensing for the game, considering it's Kojima pro. we could assume they would make something cool (snapping necks and stuff on it already sounds great) Then again it would be the rumble that would be tacked down on a 360 ver. Again it's not just controls. [QUOTE="itsallgood29"] Also you must realize that the software used to make MGS4 is the same software they use to make the 360 games. Making it MP is just a hassle not and ordeal and if Konami can make lots of money with a 360 version then they will.

What do you mean by software? If Kojima decides to take a considerable advantage of the cell for some physics he planned and even won't be able to do 100% (as he said) and other stuff as he mentioning using the 50GB BR. Even though it could be up to compression on DVD, BD already has 3 disc and doing all that just to fit it would be a hassle or bad port.

The problem with your arguement is that it relies soley on 'maybes' and 'what if's' And just for the record BR does not hold 50GB yet and it will not for quite some time
Avatar image for MrBetterThenYou
MrBetterThenYou

341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MrBetterThenYou
Member since 2005 • 341 Posts
^^^The only reason people make threads like this is because gamespot is often off the mark when it comes to reviews regardless of which system This game is miles above Wario Ware (9.1) and Perfect Dark Zero (9.0) There is no way that Crackdown is a AAA game but it definitly deserves to be considered better than these two peices of crap I guess my point is that as long as gamespot decides to review games with no real standards topics like this are inevitable (and anoying) The only good thing to come out of a topic like this is that it sends the powers that be that their rating system is junk and a level of consistency is needed