[QUOTE="MunkeySpunk92"][QUOTE="knight-k"]

PC,

FPS suck on consoles.

knight-k

cause point-and-clicking is a BLAST! i mean, im doing on the internet everyday, i just can't get enough...

Bad comparison FTW!

bad comparison how? point-and-click is how you kill people in a PC FPS. no comparison.

PC,

FPS suck on consoles.

knight-k

cause point-and-clicking is a BLAST! i mean, im doing on the internet everyday, i just can't get enough...

I thought of a great one a while ago, John St. John

or my pet/street one would be: Boomer Durfee, damn, that's catchy

moo.

and a 10 quality game will never be released on the 360 because? it can't handle quality? that wasn't very smart now was it???

like Halo 2/3 scored a 10?

Mass effect?

Too human?

Gears 2 won't score a 10, it'll have to do much more than blood/gore and pretty graphics, keep in mind, reviewers won't let the game slip through the cracks due to pretty graphics, this time, imho.

as for story, i don't expect much from a macho shooter like gears, it'll still most likely be shallow and have its far share of cheesy humor. and most likely force an emotional conflict with the characters, thanks to MGS4 raising the bar..but that won't work for obvious reasons.

this is just my opinion i see a 9.0-9.5

Eyezonmii

Cheesy, eh? I couldn't have thought of a better word for MGS4, point being different tastes man.

[QUOTE="Ket87"]MGS4, everyone knows these discussions are for consoles, PC games are not on a level playing field so Crysis don't mean jack.neogeo419

if you really have to nitpick that fair, then you really need some new ammo. You knew what he meant, but b/c he didn't make stupidly obvious he's berated for it? I thought hermits were the smartest...

Link

Anyone else think Gears of War is rapidly becoming the new Halo - Overrated and super heavily-marketed to the point of making you sick of hearing about it all the time ? :|

Gamer4Iife

a game that is hyped to no end can't be bad. It has to be REALLY good. so no, GeOW isn't overrated, it's just milked for merchandise, that's business.

[QUOTE="MunkeySpunk92"]

nope. thanks for playing though,

Bioshock gives you the freedom to play how youu want.

Battlefield games have had open world forever.

Crysis is nothing new in terms of gameplay IMO

Saturos3091

bioshock had a linear story. But the way you carried out the game was completely up to you. The TC used different methods of play as an argument so so wil I. Shoot your way through, blow them up with plasmids, hack turrets to defend you, enragee them so they fight each other, the list goes on.

[QUOTE="Khansoul"][QUOTE="Dick_Derringer"]

I think Crysis is the first FPS to step out of the post-Halo generation of shooters. The open world design combined with the nanosuit and real time weapon customization give you the freedom to play however you want. No FPS on the market comes close to giving you that sort of freedom.

Most shooters these days use linear paths with artificial boundaries to make sure everyone who plays the game plays it exatly the same way. You have no say in the matter.

Crysis lets you choose how to play. You wanna go in guns blazing? Step into armor mode, bring out the shotty and go crazy.

You wanna go guerilla style? Cloak and hook up you AR with the assault scope and a silencer. Then you go prone in the bushes and take your enemies out one by one before nobody ever knows what hit them.

Wanna be a coward? Get in strength mode, punch a dude's lights out, then use maximum speed to run away. Rinse, lather, repeat.

I think we'll start to see future shooters become more and more like Crysis. The same way shooters became more and more like Halo seven years ago.

mjarantilla

Untrue!

Crysis has beautiful graphics and that is really about it. The game is evolutionary not at all revolutionary.

Better to be evolutionary than stagnated like console FPSes.

ooop! your fanboy is showing! this thread is about Crysis, not pc fps's vs. console fps's