You have to advertise to you're audience. This isn't a game that a "casual" would buy so there's no point in wasting money. Every serious gamer would know if they want it by either coming on sites like GameSpot or by word of mouth. I doubt any serious gamer out there has no clue what Heavy Rain is.

[QUOTE="Instashot"]

Also, I didn't mean BC2 is a joke, the game is good...very good.

But overall BF2 has more MP wise since it didn't have a SP campaign.

This needs to remain a PC exclusive has the BF# type games for PC are huge in scale and really cannot be done on consoles without some serious downgrading to play on consoles.

That is why Battlefield BC2 exist, its a spin off from the PC series.

Millennium_King

What about MAG? Yea it sorta flopped but it still proves that consoles can do the massive multiplayer shooter thing.

MAG is just infantry battles though, and even then if you've played the game, it's not full scale war. It's broken up into 8v8s, so even though you're in a 64, 128, 256 player battle, it never feels that way. You will never even see half the people, and probably not even see two-thirds of them.

MAG is a great game, but it doesn't even come close to Battlefield 2.

He said add-on pack. As in the disc that contains the first two pieces of DLC released, not The Secret Armory of General Knoxx.

Splinter Cell Conviction.

I'm not buying anything in March, the only thing I would get is Battlefield: Bad Company 2 but my brother is getting that.

I'm thinking about getting Borderlands though, depending on how well the latest DLC is, so I'm still waiting for reviews.

No, a new COD is released every year. When COD 2010 comes out, the MW2 crowd is going to play that. When COD 2011 comes out, the 2010 crowd is going to move onto that.

Halo is spaced out. Two years later Halo 3 is still pulling in around 250k at it's peak. COD4 is nowhere near that, I've only seen it get to around 75k at it's peak.

I haven't been following SupCom 2. Does it sound good so far or has the decision of going multiplatform hurt the game? I'm not sure how developing an RTS for PC and console is a good decision since consoles are still in RTS infancy. It worries me that the PC version is going to suffer.

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Ok? But that can be applied to multiplats too. If I want to play Mass Effect and don't want to pay more than 200 euro there's only one choice :DGreyFoXX4

The best combo would be having all of the systems.

Playing Halo Reach, StarCraft 2, The Last Guardian and Super Mario Galaxy 2 is better than just playing StarCraft 2 and The Last Guardian. Real gamers don't miss out on games due to a non-existent console war. Our hobby is to play games, not tell other people their opinion is wrong.

[QUOTE="comeonthehoops"]Gears of War is also one of, if not the, most influential game this gen.Jandurin

I dislike Gears, probably more than most people.

However, it did do some good for the third person shooter genre. Whether or not it created them, it was a very popular game so therefore, other people are going to try and copy the same elements.