I would say Batman just cuz it's shorter, since you're just coming off of a 100 hour game. I hear Dark Souls is about 80 hours, and I finished Batman in about 16-18 hours, doing everything except the challenge arenas.
Don't get me wrong OP, I love hunting for achievements, and it sucks that you're frustrated. But I can't help but think that it's fair. If you only have 1000/1500 G, that game shouldn't be on you completed list, even if you got 1000/1000 before the DLC was released.
I thought that's how it always was; if you get 1000/1000, the game goes on the completed list, but if DLC comes out with more achievements, the game comes off the list until you get all the achievements again.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought that's how it always worked. That's how it should be anyway, if you don't want to get the DLC achievements, that's fine, but you shouldn't expect to have that game on the completed list.
I enjoyed playing Fallout 3 more than New Vegas. But I'd say that if it weren't for the bugs, New Vegas would easily be the better game. Although I probably would still have enjoyed playing Fallout 3 more if it weren't for the bugs in New Vegas, because Fallout 3 was mind blowing when I first played it, and New Vegas was more of the same... but improved IMO.
My advise to anyone who hasn't played either game would be to wait for multiple patches to be released for New Vegas and play that one.
[QUOTE="KiLLa187ScriLLa"]SHAME ON YOU! I'd rather buy a wii tbhdemonic_85
Sadly, I have to agree. I played both and think that the Wii is the most accurate and accessible of the three devices. I had high hopes for the PS Move though as I already have a PS3 and saw it as adding a $100 Wii to it. I found it to be highly inaccurate as well.
I disagree with this completely. I've played a lot of PS Move so far and it's definitely more accurate than the Wii. Sure, the PS Move doesn't have much good software out yet, but I'd say the technology is extremely solid.
Log in to comment