[QUOTE="Nintendoes"]Please post discussion such as this on reviews for Super Mario Galaxy in the newly-created stickied thread for review discussion on Super Mario Galaxy, thank-you.catfishmoon23

Nah, this thread is fine I think.

The sticky thread is for disscussion about what score GS will give Super Mario Galaxy.

Hm, you may be right, though it says "all review discussion here" in the topic title.

Yeah, there's Actraiser, but that's not a Square-Enix title, it's an Enix title from 1991.

Enix didn't absorb Square until 2003. So I assume that Square's portion of the company is refusing to release gems like Chrono Trigger on the Virtual Console...(mabye, because I don't know what the hell I'm talking about) If Chrono Trigger were released on the DS, I would pay top dollar for it. That much I do know.

I have a Chrono Trigger tattoo, so obviously I'm hyped about any chance of seeing it on any system other than in my bedroom on the PS1.

I do wonder though considering that Actraiser is post merger Enix title, does that make it any more possible that we may see Dragon Warrior 1, 2, or 3 on the Virtual Console?

chefstubbies

No, because Enix merged with Square, the game is wholly owned by Square Enix, along with all other games that Enix has copyright claimant over.

right out of the boxsherbert-lime

Oh, well then that's different. Somone's definitely liable. Possibly Nintendo, but maybe the retailer you bought it from.

[QUOTE="Moridin18"][QUOTE="Duckman5"][QUOTE="Moridin18"]

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]They never confirmed a LAN mode. You tricked yourself.Duckman5

They never once corrected it on ALL the preview(s) that mentioned the mode on all the major sites, not once. So don't pull that BS with me that they never read it once and did not know that the info was out their, esecially when the were not releasing info and the sites where gamers only form of info.All the fan sites and IGN, gamespot, etc. Like i sad total BS.

Kinda of like how they dropped the ball and waited untill released for the general public to know it would be 1 vs and no 4 players. But they demo'ed the game in LAN but never demo'ed 4 player so that not nearly as bad.

Link please.

FOr what?

You show me a site that the developers said that LAN would not be in it. Every fan-site I saw mentioned LAN play. The preview from major sites ( IGN and gamespot) mentioned LAN if my memory serves me correct. Both of the sites have had people on their message-boards question the exclusion of LAN. WIthour notice. Kuju reads stuff to they not? Did they not notice a thread on this site (or ign) talking about the game? If so then they did read the previews on sites(or at least watching the Internet about the buzz about their game)and they should have notice the constant mention of LAN. This I think is indisputable.

I give you this. They did not literally lie. But......come on if they watch it that close then they should have noticed the constant talk in endless previews and fansites of the LAN mode.

I love advanced wars and Battalion Wars but in no way on this earth am I going to pay full price for a game that has a feature ripped out of it with no explanation.(come on Kuju LIE to me at least give me a reason, even if not rational, for this last second removal)

I can play advanced war games on GBA on lan, but on a system with built in WIif I can't. That is jacked up and if one says it is not, I must tell that person....

They never confirmed it, theat's my exact point. Everything else was just speculation. You can't provide a link so your argument is invalid.

Duckman has a point. You can't remove something that was never there to begin with.

[QUOTE="Nintendoes"]

You can communicate with pre-entered messages that come with the game like "Yes!", "I need backup!", and "Flanke ihnen!", (depending on what side you use.)

Duckman5

Which is totally useless since you need to do into a menu, then scroll down and select your icon. When you are doing this your player stops moving so if you want backup youd be dead before you even call for help.

True. If my experience with Medal of Honor: Allied Assault is similar, they are completely useless unless you want to annoy the other team by taunting them.

You can communicate with pre-entered messages that come with the game like "Yes!", "I need backup!", and "Flanke ihnen!", (depending on what side you use.)

[QUOTE="blingchu55"][QUOTE="ljlrj"]

[QUOTE="blingchu55"]last time i checked enix doesnt do vchyrueprince11

how would u know u work 4them or something

no, but nintendo powere clearly stated "Square Enix has no plans to ever bring any games to the virtual console"

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/actraiser/tech_info.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=stats&tag=stats;techinfo

what about actraiser?

Square Enix holds the rights for the Virtual Console edition of the game, so they probably must have worked out a deal with Nintendo on that, contrary to what Nintendo Power has stated.