i hate games that have a lot of micro.

maybe that's why i didn't like sc that much. at a certain point it became so much about who follows a built routine the fastest.

Ontain

kid, after seeing your post i can tell you've never played starcraft for more than 5 minutes. stfu about something you don't know about. and you must be pretty stupid if you can't remember to build a spawning pool, extractor, lair, then spire, or hydralisk den. also starcraft is about controlling economy or macro.

There was a time when HALO was king.

 

It was a time when Xbox was easily more powerful than PS2.

 

 

 

Standards have risen....too bad the bar wasn't reset.

 

Now it would seem Halo is struggling to keep up with a year old game with a mediocre 8.6

 

 

If that gets an 8.6 with LAG FREE 40 PLAYER GAMES WITH THOSE GRAPHICS....

Then I'd don't want to know what 12 room lagfests with this gets.....

 

At this point my stock is in Haze...I am putting CASH on the fact Killzone 2 will shame the likes of Unreal 3, CoD4, Haze, let ALONE Halo 3.

My words are not the gold standard in these forums but I ask you this...how long can you laugh at Killzone 2? How long can you claim Halo's greatness? How long can you deny PS3 is slowly but surely PASSING 360 in terms of graphics? Will there be nobody accepting the defeat of Halo 3 when Killzone 2 is shown this year?

 

July 13....a day every Cow shall remember....

NextGenNow

does killzone2 have 4 player co-op online? does it have matchmaking that tracks how many kills, assists, and deaths you have? does it have a ranking system. does it have a f*cking spartan laser? how about equipment, something that's never been done b4 in a console. completely balanced weapon set. every weapon has it's uses even the needler and no weapon is useless. Also Halo has a community to back it up. The beta has over 40,000 people playing as we speak and that's just the beta. when was the last time any PS game had over 20,000 people playing at once? your argument was weak and you should just sell your piece of **** 3 so you can feel better about ur insecurities about consoles nerd.

If Blizzard actually manages to port Starcraft 2 to the consoles will it strengthen the already huge fanbase or weaken it? Well id just like to know your opinions about this and also I do know that Blizzard as of now has no plans on porting to the consoles.

Zero_Fate_

don't worry about it. the game won't be on consoles so why even make a thread about it.

neways it will decrease it's fanbase because if an RTS is on consoles it will have to dumb down it's gameplay. look at LOTR and CNC3. There's no micro involved in those games.

If they dumb it down so they can put it on consoles, they've just lost a fan and i'll continue playing SC1. 

I think halo3 final release on september going to be lacking comparing to gears of war grahpic. Just my though I know its halo3 is running on beta but 3 month away from release date i dont think its going to look any better. You guys probably wont noticie any difference. metroid_mario

who the hell cares. Gears of War doesnt have man cannons, awesome snow effects, 16 player multiplayer, maps that are 10x as big as gridlock, a dynamic spawn system (except on annex but you spawn at the same spot). and you can't even jump in that game. All you can do is roadie run and hide behind cover. the engine doesnt have to process half as much information as Halo 3 does so no sh1t it's going to look worse than Gears but who the hell cares it's going to play 50x better and the beta alone has over 50,000 people playing as I speak. and that's just the BETA imagine how many people will be playing once the retail game comes out in sept 25. also the netcode is so much better than Gears. I can't even shoot my lancer in gears without the bullets being 1-2 inches apart. In Halo you can't even tell the difference if your host or offhost.

halo>gears

/thread 

this is how some ppl play this game

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BEC42EpGgs 

starcraft is nothing like CNC3 where you just send your units to attack and take a nap or something. you actually have to micro.

I am not a  hermit. I own a 360 wii and pc and about to play Halo 3 

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]I'm pretty sure it won't.BioShockOwnz

Starcraft 1 was on the N64, with extra missions, and 2 player split screen.

Exactly. I believe Garnett Lee on this one. After seeing BFMEII and C&C3 on 360, I am pretty sure Blizzard will bring StarCraft to consoles.

unlike those games Starcraft actually takes micro. in those game u just send ur units to the opponents base and go grab a soda or something. in SC2 you have to micro,macro so much better than those two games you just listed. SC2 just simply would never work on consoles. the guy at 1up plays too much UMS. I have a 360, wii, and  PC so dont call me a fanboy 

Better - Starcraft 2

Bigger - Starcraft 2

More innovative - Crysis

More immersive - Crysis

My opinion - Starcraft 2

nyoroism

whats so innovative about crysis? giving you an ingame speed hack, and having amazing graphics?

graphics are overrated SC2 all the way it will be better in terms of gameplay sales and community. Remember a game called farcry that came out a few years ago's Multiplayer compared to a little game that came out 9 years ago called Starcraft. 2d > 3d